We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Virtuozzo Application Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the flexibility of this solution."
"It streamlines tasks like table creation and data loading into Redshift, making the process more efficient and manageable."
"The capacity to grow dynamically based on our needs is most valuable. We can increase resources dynamically. It is also very reliable and fast to implement."
"You can instantly scale resources up or down as needed, avoiding the need to build infrastructure from scratch."
"It's very easy to use."
"I think the AWS interface is good. It's easy to understand and use."
"Our primary use case is to use the solution for running many relatively small instances for back office applications and various other business important applications."
"They integrate well with various other solutions."
"Technical support from Jelastic is very good."
"The control is valuable. It's really easy to use and you have good control of your solutions."
"The advanced level of production-ready Docker hosting, one-click application deployment, and the truly flexible pricing."
"The dynamic vertical scaling is a unique feature."
"The solution is scalable, and that is what we are looking at. There is no learning curve as we have not done much research."
"The pricing of AWS is very unclear. They make it quite confusing."
"Faster API response times and an improved console experience would be better. Enhanced performance across APIs and the console would streamline our workflows."
"We would like to see if AWS includes any inbuilt automation. Also, we are very interested in AWS's AI/ML features, as well as IoT, AR, and VR."
"One area that could be improved is in data management. They could improve on the data side. For example, I see others with better cloud services and larger data computing capabilities."
"We don't know whether to increase server capacity or alert notifications. We don't know which hard disc to purchase or what the next recommended CPU is. There should be an indicator. We would like to have more guidance."
"At times we find ourselves a little trapped, with the lack of customization, for what we need."
"The solution could improve by being more secure."
"There should be improvement in terms of creating databases of varying sizes which would provide flexibility."
"For now, some customers are requesting support of Docker containers for Windows."
"Lacks better integration into enterprise storage products."
"The backup functionality needs to be improved."
"The security layers also need to be improved because there is no clear layer or tier of security in the solution."
"The backup features need improvement, or rather it should be added, as I could not find it."
More Virtuozzo Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Virtuozzo Application Platform is ranked 15th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Virtuozzo Application Platform is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Virtuozzo Application Platform writes "A scalable and stable solution that has good scalability and is easy to setup ". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Virtuozzo Application Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure, OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform, VMware Tanzu Application Service and DigitalOcean. See our Amazon AWS vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.