We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Docker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the scalability they're currently providing. Integration was very easy. It was a good experience."
"Initial setup is straightforward. It only takes 15 minutes to deploy."
"The solution has very good basic features."
"EKS has security features that you can't find in competing solutions."
"The solution is easy to use."
"What I found most valuable in Amazon EKS is its maturity as a cloud computing technology."
"The most valuable features of Amazon EKS are its auto scaling ability and the ability for service discovery."
"Through Amazon EKS, we can have the blue-green deployment very easily."
"Docker is very reliable. It's easy to scale, and it's very stable."
"I think the best feature is to replicate anything in our local machine using a simple command."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is the dedicated QA environment for connecting the team members. Additionally, there are many core features available and it is highly secure when we are imaging a client's server."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is its portability, ease of security management, and low resource usage."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the Dockerfile, which makes the life of developers easy. Developers get a real understanding of container creation."
"The most valuable feature is that it gives you the same environment as on a developer machine as well as a production machine relevant to specifications."
"I think that with Docker, it is easy to deploy it on different platforms."
"Docker allows you to run multiple virtual machines independently."
"Setup depends on what kind of architecture you have"
"I would like to see it a little more stable, more operational, and more convenient to develop."
"I am not impressed with the tool's Amazon console. It also needs to add security features."
"I would like to see the user interface improved because it is hard to find and not straightforward."
"I'm having difficulty getting my AWS clusters to communicate with my local machine."
"The tool's setup is complex."
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration."
"A cluster is required on-premises, which takes a lot of time."
"The Kubernetes blocks need improvement since Docker has many holes in it."
"Unfortunately, base images are not currently available."
"We are facing multiple issues with the solution's stability."
"One item that could be improved is the overall stability of Docker."
"Docker could improve by having security vulnerability reports."
"We have found that it is not easy to install it into a Windows system."
"I advise new users to review their website, commands, and the steps for creating images."
"I would love to have it available on Linux."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Docker is ranked 7th in Container Management with 40 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Docker is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Linode and Komodor, whereas Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. See our Amazon EKS vs. Docker report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
