We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Rancher Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use."
"EKS provides autoscaling functionality."
"I like its auto-scale feature very much."
"The stability is excellent."
"It has valuable monitoring and insights features."
"The most valuable features of Amazon EKS are its auto scaling ability and the ability for service discovery."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"What I found most valuable in Amazon EKS is its maturity as a cloud computing technology."
"The product is simple to use for a beginner."
"The customized deployment process is the most valuable feature in Rancher Labs."
"The scalability potential is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment."
"The solution is stable."
"Rancher Labs is a very user-friendly tool."
"This solution is not vendor-locked, which means that we we are able to use it across all of our resources; this feature is of great value to us."
"A great UI with very good integrations."
"The solution should include a popup for clusters so that all relevant information is visible at the bottom of a page."
"I would like to see the user interface improved because it is hard to find and not straightforward."
"The main thing to improve with Amazon EKS is the price. However, these services can be very expensive. For example, in countries like Turkey, the cost is too high. That's why we offer our cloud solutions locally. We developed hybrid solutions, but their prices are still very high."
"The graphical user interface could be better."
"I encountered problems with the product’s documentation."
"The solution could be improved by adding monitoring, filtering, and logging capabilities to its current CloudWatch features."
"They should include some essential configuration features to it."
"I'd like improved traffic handling and additional application details within the system."
"We're looking for something that is even easier to use. It's a bit complicated."
"We'd like their monitoring tool to be integrated by default."
"The solution could improve by adding more features in the dashboard, such as monitoring, scanning, and security. This would be a great benefit."
"They should improve application visibility along with code visibility."
"There needs to be an improvement in observability and microservice monitoring tools in Rancher Labs."
"We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications."
"One area for improvement in Rancher Labs is the development aspect."
"Could be more intuitive."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Rancher Labs is ranked 5th in Container Management with 14 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Rancher Labs is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rancher Labs writes "An easy-to-use user interface, which makes it easy to work with Kubernetes and containers". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Linode and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, whereas Rancher Labs is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Docker, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Google Kubernetes Engine. See our Amazon EKS vs. Rancher Labs report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
