We performed a comparison between Amazon EventBridge and IBM MQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon EventBridge is very flexible."
"The best feature is that it allows you to perform recurring tasks efficiently."
"It has self-explanatory documentation and works with most projects."
"It's very simple to set up our cron with Amazon EventBridge."
"I haven't seen any issues with respect to the message loss."
"The most valuable features are RDQM and queue sharing."
"It is useful for exchanging information between applications."
"The initial setup is easy."
"This product has good security."
"It improves reliability and guarantees that messages are not lost."
"The solution can scale well."
"The most valuable feature is the stability. It's perfect in this way."
"It would be good if the solution provided a feature to add multiple Cron expressions in one rule."
"It would be easy if we had an option to select multiple things to run the script from Monday to Friday."
"Currently, it only supports triggering one job at a time. It would be helpful if it could handle multiple jobs or triggers simultaneously. What I mean is that currently, we can only perform one job at a time."
"Amazon EventBridge doesn't have the feature of event replay."
"I would just like a more user-friendly experience to do common administration tasks. I know that you can use MQ Explorer, but having something that's already built in would definitely be useful."
"IBM MQ could streamline its complexity to be more like Kafka without the channel complexities of clusters, making it more straightforward."
"In the next release, I would like for there to be easier monitoring. The UI should be easier for non-technical users to set up appliances and servers."
"It's not always easy for applications to connect to IBM MQ, but I think it's fine in general."
"Customer support response times could be improved."
"We have had scalability issues with some projects in the past."
"The pricing needs improvement."
"The scalability is the one area where IBM has fallen behind. As much as it is used, there is a limit to the number of people who are skilled in MQ. That is definitely an issue. Places have kept their MQ-skilled people and other places have really struggled to get MQ skills. It's not a widely-known skillset."
Amazon EventBridge is ranked 4th in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) with 4 reviews while IBM MQ is ranked 1st in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) with 158 reviews. Amazon EventBridge is rated 9.0, while IBM MQ is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EventBridge writes "Allows automatic notifications for events and stable performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method". Amazon EventBridge is most compared with Amazon SNS, PubSub+ Event Broker, Oracle BAM, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and PubSub+ Event Portal, whereas IBM MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, VMware Tanzu Data Services, Red Hat AMQ and IBM Event Streams. See our Amazon EventBridge vs. IBM MQ report.
See our list of best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.
We monitor all Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.