We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The product enables the users to query results faster."
"The integration capabilities of MongoDB are fine for the solutions that we use in our company."
"Sharding is an excellent feature of MongoDB."
"One of the biggest benefits is the speed and flexibility of the documents, especially when it comes to modifications."
"The reports are useful for controlling the load of our whole architecture."
"MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial."
"It has visible benefits, actually, in terms of price of ownership if you compare it to, for example, Oracle."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to Text Search can be used anywhere and anytime."
"Its flexibility, and cost. It is reasonably priced."
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."
"MongoDB should better support small and medium companies. There are a lot of clients out there that are interested, however, they need something lighter and less complex and something not so expensive upfront."
"Its security features can be better. Sometimes, my higher authority says that we are not going to use MongoDB because it doesn't provide that much security for the RDBMS or relational data that we use for transactions. Instead of MongoDB, we will use Oracle Database because for a transactional service, you have to rely on RDBMS ACID properties. I would love to work on MongoDB by using my mobile phone. When I am working remotely or traveling and have some instances deployed on my server, I should be able to check through my mobile whether all the data is being pulled. GitHub has a similar feature, where it lets you read from the laptop, and you can also pull and push with your mobile phone. I would request MongoDB to provide such a feature. Basically, I want a mobile version for both iOS and Android versions."
"The analytics needs improvement."
"The solution should have better integration."
"I don't see a lot of areas that need improvement."
"You need integration with other tools to run the query in MongoDB."
"We'd like technical support to respond faster to queries."
"Our program developer finds it to be a little unstable, development-wise."
Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". Amazon QLDB is most compared with , whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.