We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Informatica Business Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is user-friendly."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"The solution is quite configurable so it is easy to code within a configuration kind of environment."
"Apache Airflow is useful for workflow automation, making it capable of automating pipelines, data pipelines, and data warehouse processes."
"We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it."
"I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet."
"Informatica Business Process Manager is easy to use and learn."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"The automation capabilities could be improved; a visual workflow designer and a graphical tool to reduce coding would be very helpful. But for now, it's sufficient for our simple workflows."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."
"We cannot run real-time jobs in the solution."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"The dashboards could be enhanced."
"The graphical user interface can be improved."
"I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities."
"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 20th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "An easy-to-use solution for ETL purposes ". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM and IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Camunda and Oracle BPM. See our Apache Airflow vs. Informatica Business Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.