AWS Auto Scaling vs AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring and AWS Auto Scaling based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the end-user monitoring.""It provides a lot of data, so it helps businesses identify their user base.""The most valuable feature is the one that enables you to have visibility into the end-users journey.""It is a stable solution that helps address user issues well.""We used AppDynamics to identify gaps and bottlenecks in the software.""We can see the customer's path from their computer to the backend systems.""The feature we find most valuable, is that the solution creates a unified platform making it really easy to pinpoint a problem, and then drill down into a transaction to resolve the issue.""AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring provides smooth connectivity to different applications."

More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Pros →

"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively.""AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses.""The product provides self-healing features.""It is a stable platform.""The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment.""The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy.""The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."

More AWS Auto Scaling Pros →

Cons
"The interface and user experience could be better.""While I am not expecting it in the next release, I would want more centralized management of the agent in the platform and better support.""I would like to have customizable dashboards to use when I am monitoring certain applications.""I would like to see support for mobile testing and mobile monitoring.""If you have a single URL and all the operations are coming in as part of the header, you will not be able to segregate them for different actions.""They do not have robust documentation.""AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring needs to offer an end-to-end experience, including the internet layer and third-party elements that come into play on websites.""AppD is really cool and a unified solution for both APM and APM centric Analytics side. We can show almost all business data within the APM context from the end-user perspetive. But this process is a little bit manual. If they catch and map business journeys based on customer interaction on the browser automatically, it should be really fine."

More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Cons →

"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better.""In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly.""The tool must include AI features.""It could be cheaper.""The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved.""The solution must improve automation.""The product could add more features for managing instances.""The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."

More AWS Auto Scaling Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This price of this product is expensive."
  • "AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors."
  • "AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring does have licensing cost associated with it."
  • "AppDynamics does not usually do monthly payments. They do it on an annual basis, at the very least."
  • "We have two different licensing models for this solution. One of them is the agent based model, which requires payment per agent. The other is an infrastructure based model, where the price is based on the CPU core. For the infrastructure model wholesale level pricing applies. All of the up to date licensing prices for this product are available on the manufacturers website."
  • "The pricing needs to come down."
  • More AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
  • "AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
  • "The product has moderate pricing."
  • "The product is expensive."
  • "AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
  • "AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."
  • "AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."
  • More AWS Auto Scaling Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One noteworthy feature is user journey analysis, which enables tracking user interactions and conversion paths on a website.
    Top Answer:The pricing falls within the mid-range category. I would rate it between three to five because considering the features provided, it offers value for money. If utilized effectively, the investment is… more »
    Top Answer:In user monitoring, AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring should provide a better user experience. It needs to offer an end-to-end experience, including the internet layer and third-party elements… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When… more »
    Top Answer:AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution. We pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution.
    Top Answer:In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly.
    Ranking
    Views
    692
    Comparisons
    540
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    689
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    289
    Comparisons
    211
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    323
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AWS Auto-Scaling
    Learn More
    Overview

    How do real users experience your browser-based applications? Using browser real-user monitoring follow their journey and optimize their experience with powerful end-to-end performance management that rapidly identifies application issues and relevant business transactions, and dramatically reduces MTTR.

    AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

    Sample Customers
    Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Non Tech Company18%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise2%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Auto Scaling vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is ranked 25th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 14 reviews while AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2, while AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring writes "End-to-end visibility, feature-rich, but the support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is most compared with Elastic Observability, New Relic, Sentry and AWS X-Ray, whereas AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with . See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.