We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Cavisson NetDiagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."This solution not only provides answers but also provides sensor data. This allows us to quickly resolve issues that developers may take a long time to solve."
"The features that I like best are the dashboard and Business Journey."
"We previously had an operations team continuously monitoring applications. Now, they just have set things up and our developers can monitor, view, and act on them, accordingly."
"I have found the main feature of the solution to be its ability to analyze an application's code to see where there are issues. Additionally, it is easy to use and configure."
"This is a stable product and we definitely plan to continue using it in the future."
"The most valuable feature is the detailed statistics, like the consumer count, for the ActiveMQ server."
"AppDynamics is scalable."
"The most valuable features of AppDynamics is the scalability and monitoring."
"Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."
"The solution could improve by covering more technologies. For example, it does support .NET Core applications. However, it could be a bit better."
"Its resiliency can be improved. We're told that the best we can do with an on-prem solution is to have a hot standby that requires a manual switchover. So, it is a do-it-yourself Ikea model of maintaining data consistency between two servers, without having low balance or failover considerations for an on-prem solution."
"There could log management features included in the product."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"I would like them to change their business model for scalability to accommodate growing companies. The business model should be more flexible."
"They need to improve the consolidation of agents for the agent's installation process."
"The solution could be more user-friendly for diagnostic purposes. Anyone who is using the solution should be able to infer what that error is about, they should be able to troubleshoot it better."
"Installation and configuration can be very tough. An average user without specialized knowledge can't do this. You need to have DevOps and QA teams handle it. During installation, a lot of customers get stuck trying to track the database or the API part, and they have to contact customer support."
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 155 reviews while Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 87th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.