We performed a comparison between Appgate SDP and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is really friendly. It's simple to understand."
"It is a scalable solution...The support answers your questions very fast."
"One of the most important features is stopping lateral movement across our network."
"The flexibility of the tool is valuable. It is very robust. It has a very robust configuration capability."
"The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can seamlessly connect to the company's network or switch to the internet with minimal effort."
"It is pretty stable."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Scalability-wise, it is a great product."
"It is easy to integrate, especially if I consider the fact that it gives me a single dashboard where I have all the applications or apps displayed."
"UI representation is the aspect I like the most about GCP, even more than Azure or AWS."
"There is a certain accessibility feature that I can set using a cloud identity, which is really valuable to us."
"Scalability-wise, it is an easy solution to scale up. I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy provides more control of our assets because normally when you're using Google Cloud, you have to use your Google email. IAP can control the assets that only come from the dedicated company or IP address."
"The solution is very easy to use. It's easy to navigate and to work with."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"It would be better to connect to an application portal from any device. Documentation and support could be better."
"One thing that kind of sticks out to me is the ability to do a proper non-split tunnel. VPN tunnel-wise, it is not really a true unsplit tunnel, but I think that's just because of the way it's designed. A split VPN basically allows your system to talk to other systems without being forced down the tunnel. A VPN running in a non-split tunnel mode forces all the traffic down the tunnel to wherever you're VPNing to. It forces the traffic down so that the traffic is subject to the firewall and rules that you have in your corporate environment and such. It helps to prevent remote malicious folks that may be talking directly to that box from piggybacking into the corporate environment through it. They do it partially, but it would be nice to see more of an enterprise-level solution there."
"On the cloud, when you make some changes, it may be difficult."
"One limitation is that it's harder to provide access to multiple applications in the company with Appgate, but that's probably because of poor management."
"The user interface should be improved as it is not very easy to work with the updates."
"They could provide a single-box solution to manage tools for 4000 users. Additionally, they could add extra features to enhance remote micro connection."
"The stability regarding voice commands in the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"Despite using GCP for all the resources, potential clusters on GCP caused difficulties."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy could be more user-friendly and less expensive."
"We encounter issues while setting up emails for the solution."
"the documentation could be a bit better in terms of what is presented on the screen versus what actually happens."
"I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware."
"The storage capacity of the product is an area that can be improved if it is made possible to increase it whenever you want."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and should have descriptive manuals on the page website."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Appgate SDP is ranked 5th in ZTNA with 6 reviews while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 6th in ZTNA with 44 reviews. Appgate SDP is rated 8.8, while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Appgate SDP writes "Helps us manage traffic-related issues and streamlines access management for the network ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". Appgate SDP is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler Internet Access, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter and Netskope Private Access, whereas Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo. See our Appgate SDP vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report.
See our list of best ZTNA vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.