We performed a comparison between ARIS Process Governance and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very easy-to-use product."
"Using this solution we can design our own processor governance, assign some specific technical services, and also run tests of the process to make sure it operates as we need it to."
"Ability to use all the features that your catalog has inside the modeling and export it to a BPM augmentation engine."
"The drag-and-drop functionality in Signavio is impressive and user-friendly, allowing easy connection to other elements without the need for excessive back-and-forth."
"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."
"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."
"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it."
"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."
"The features I find most valuable are ease of use and the Collaboration Hub."
"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."
"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."
"It's a bit annoying that you have to use two environments in the older version."
"The solution uses a coding language for process design that is specific only to this product. We would like to see this changed to something more universal."
"There is a lot of complexity around licensing."
"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."
"The solution is complex."
"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The price can be made cheaper."
"Two executives cannot work on one modeling process simultaneously."
"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
ARIS Process Governance is ranked 34th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews. ARIS Process Governance is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS Process Governance writes "Easy to use, reliable, and simple to expand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". ARIS Process Governance is most compared with , whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our ARIS Process Governance vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.