We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"The technology is good."
"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"Tenable SC's most valuable features are the low number of false positives and the strong capability of providing prioritization for the vulnerabilities detected."
"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."
"Tenable.sc's best features are the availability model, accident management, and scoring."
"I find Tenable SC to be a very scalable product."
"Tenable.sc is user-friendly."
"Support is knowledgeable."
"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."
"Very customizable with a lot of templates."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"I think the vendor training provided for Tenable.sc could be a lower price. It's quite expensive for the training."
"I will say it's a lot slower compared to an MS scan. It takes so much longer, so the performance could definitely be worked on."
"The web application scanning area can be improved."
"Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers."
"The web application is not very functional."
"There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy."
"The product could be user-friendly, and they could enhance the web application's security features."
"Tenable.sc's user interface could be improved."
Armis is ranked 13th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "Improves device visibility and adapts according to an organization’s security demands". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Claroty Platform and runZero, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Horizon3.ai. See our Armis vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
