We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In the event of a controller appliance failure or downtime, the system seamlessly transitions control to any access point acting as a backup controller."
"It’s very stable and reliable."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is stable and good."
"Aruba is a very stable system."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I like the solution's ability to add multiple SSIDs on different levels such as enterprise and guest networks."
"We don't know this product very well yet, but what we have used so far and what we like are user control, bandwidth, and access."
"The solution's strong security mechanism and user-friendly web console are great."
"The solution is easy to use and flexible."
"This access point provides internet to every lab on campus, including the computer laboratory"
"We had a client with a power plant. Different wireless devices from various brands caused problems. We fixed it using the Ubiquiti Wireless UDM controller and installed 75 access points and antennas."
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"The most valuable feature is more access points."
"It's very easy to deploy."
"I have found the most valuable features to be how user-friendly it is and how simple it is to do the configurations."
"Easy to set up and maintain and simple to configure."
"The price for the license could be a bit improved since it is the only area with an issue."
"We'd like to have a bit more artificial intelligence incorporated into existing products."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is expensive."
"What needs to improve in Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is the support because it takes quite a long time for the support team to resolve issues. Whenever a new version or update is released, my company sees many bugs and issues, so that is another area for improvement as well."
"In a meshed environment, the handoff between access points is sometimes not smooth when users are mobile. For example, a connection is occasionally interrupted when a user takes their laptop from the gym to the cafeteria."
"Support is not good...The support can be improved, especially in India, since whenever I require support, it takes some time."
"This solution needs different models that are more specialized for certain customers."
"Aruba's technical support has room for improvement."
"There is really nothing wrong with the product but there are ways the utility and features can be expanded to meet future demands."
"We'd like them to improve aspects of device management."
"Ubiquiti could develop a more elaborate firewall solution. Their firewall solutions at the moment are entry-level. Maybe they don't want to bring those products in because many people prefer putting a third-party firewall into a solution like that. We usually do."
"I would like to see this solution have any kind of captive portal on the tool or user accounting tool. This would be quite useful for companies."
"We use different models of the solution but in some cases, the security could improve in the adaptive portal, be a little more robust, and easier to use."
"Could be more secure and the controller more user-friendly."
"They should have more VLAN features and a designing tool like a link planer."
"The Unifi controller software has a small issue."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.