We performed a comparison between AuditBoard and OneTrust GRC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."
"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."
"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."
"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."
"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."
"The most valuable feature of AuditBoard is its ability to facilitate the editing of work papers in a seamless and efficient manner. This is achieved through a built-in tool that allows for real-time editing without the need for downloading the working paper. This feature has proven to be incredibly time-saving for me as it eliminates the step of having to download the file and make changes, instead providing an easy-to-access "edit work paper" option. Overall, this feature has greatly improved my experience with AuditBoard and has been a significant contributor to its success in my opinion."
"Considering the solution's return on investment, it has been extremely helpful since we were doing a lot of documentation. Previously, in our company, we were using an Excel sheet which made things quite messy."
"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."
"As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"Vendors can be assessed and rated out of the tool, and assessments can be scheduled for updates at certain intervals."
"We have data from Jira regarding addiction related to Europe as well as California. Additionally, we have data related to the Indian Data Protection Bill. Therefore, GDPR compliance is highly beneficial."
"OneTrust GRC offers policy management, including documentation, distribution, attestation, and policy management."
"We receive notifications or cases and prioritize them accordingly, which helps us address issues promptly."
"OneTrust GRC is stable."
"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."
"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."
"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."
"They should improve the solution's test sheets feature for ease of use."
"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."
"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."
"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."
"Everything is there, and I have no disadvantage to note as of now."
"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
"There are several areas for improvement. One is the integration capability. Connecting various DSAR systems can be time-consuming if a single integration takes months to complete."
"The Vendor Risk dashboard is quite basic today and not interactive, but improvements are in coming the next releases."
"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."
"There are limitations to customized workflow automation, and they need to increase both the available automation and the customized workflow."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"The product is not that easy to set up."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
AuditBoard is ranked 2nd in GRC with 11 reviews while OneTrust GRC is ranked 5th in GRC with 9 reviews. AuditBoard is rated 8.6, while OneTrust GRC is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AuditBoard writes "User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneTrust GRC writes "Effective privacy management, but the technical support could improve, and it is difficult to implement". AuditBoard is most compared with Workiva Wdesk, RSA Archer, IBM OpenPages and LogicGate, whereas OneTrust GRC is most compared with RSA Archer, ProcessUnity, Workiva Wdesk, LogicGate and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management. See our AuditBoard vs. OneTrust GRC report.
See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
