Based on our user's reviews, we compared Okta Workforce Identity and Auth0 across several parameters.
Based on the user reviews and considering the overall sentiment, Okta Workforce Identity is preferred over Auth0. Users highly value Okta's seamless integration with various applications and systems, robust security measures, and user-friendly interface. They also appreciate Okta's exceptional customer service and support. While Auth0 also receives positive feedback for its ROI, seamless integration, and user-friendly interface, Okta's customer service and support and its ability to streamline access management processes give it an edge over Auth0.
"The most valuable feature is interface application integration, but we haven't fully used it yet. We'll need it in the future for a few potential clients."
"The most valuable feature is that it is simple to integrate, irrespective of your codebase."
"It has a lot of customization and out-of-the-box features."
"The most important thing for me is compliance. Everything that they have developed in Auth0 is already certified by many regulators such as ISO. So, we do not need to take care of that. We have the shared responsibility model to share assets with other products we are using in the cloud."
"I simply use the JWT from the client on the server side to process requests and push updated profile data to a database/queue as needed and end the process without having to persist data in the web server (sessions)."
"It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users."
"The valuable features are that it is extremely secure and that it's developer-friendly."
"It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on."
"This solution has a lot of capabilities and features."
"What I found most valuable in Okta Workforce Identity is that it worked together with VMware Workspace One, so there was this device check at the same time. My company used the trusted device method that enabled you to define that only the trusted devices including the Workspace One agent were able to access the applications directly without an additional authentication step."
"The most valuable feature in Okta Workforce Identity is the single sign-on, universal directory, and lifecycle management."
"The feature that is most valuable to me is the automated user provisioning that we set up using Okta as a major part of that process."
"The initial setup is easy."
"We face no challenges in integrating the product with our legacy systems."
"The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."
"I find the provisioning features and the integration with other applications useful."
"The Management API could be improved so it's easier to get user information."
"The tool's price should be improved."
"The product support for multi-tenancy could be improved."
"In the past, there was an issue with the multi-tenant where there wasn't the ability to manage them."
"There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product."
"The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly."
"There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that."
"The product could use a more flexible administration structure"
"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."
"It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"The guest user access could be improved."
"There are some issues with the interface that can be improved."
"The ability or the options in the solution for changing the look and feel are not good enough because in our partner portal, essentially what they have is an ugly admin interface."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve provisioning it can be made simpler."
Auth0 is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 14 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews. Auth0 is rated 8.2, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Has good documentation but improvement is needed in MFA and application configurations ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Auth0 is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Cloudflare Access and Red Hat Single Sign On, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and IBM Security Verify Access. See our Auth0 vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.