We performed a comparison between Automation Anywhere (AA) and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."By using this, we are saving time and we no need to do routine work, as it is now automated and the result is shared with all of the end-users."
"The Visual Studio integration is smooth and user-friendly."
"The support team is good and is able to resolve the issues or any challenges we encounter."
"The integrations with the OCR engines in Automation Anywhere are quite powerful. It has helped us in many projects."
"The flexibility which has been built into it is its most valuable feature."
"Workbench, which is a development tool, is very friendly. It is complete. Compared to Power Automate, Automation Anywhere is much more comprehensive and easy to understand."
"It is an easy product. It is easier and less complex than any other RPA tool in the market. It is a popular product."
"The scalability of this solution is good compared to others."
"Selenuim helps us during testing. We are able to reduce the number and frequency of manual efforts by using scripts."
"For me, the most valuable feature of Selenium lies in its ability to help us find elements quickly. Apart from that, the driver interface is really useful, too. When we implement the Selenium driver interface, we can easily navigate through all of the pages and sections of an app, including performing things like clicking, putting through SendKeys, scrolling down, tagging, and all the other actions we need to test for in an application."
"The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing."
"Selenium HQ has a lot of capabilities and is compatible with many languages."
"Selenium web driver - Java."
"Selenium WebDriver and Selenium IDE are useful."
"The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations."
"Since Selenium HQ has multiple plug-ins, we can use it with multiple tools and multiple languages."
"OCR technology could be more inclusive by offering a wider range of supported languages, as its current selection is limited."
"We would like it to be more user-friendly."
"We have been looking at processes which can easily transition into a large scale environment, where you can have cloud or hybrid model. However, being a bank, some of our processes are critical and we would like to hold those on-premise. This limits us with our usage of Automation Anywhere."
"I don't use the technical support a lot. It feels like a lot of time that they will ask us to check the user manual."
"Built-in HTML features are lagging in this solution, whereas in UiPath, they are very good."
"Automation Anywhere could benefit from a more technical focus."
"There are occasional bugs in the system but technical support is quick to address them and deliver solutions, patches, and upgrades."
"We had a major issue when it came to single sign-on. We couldn't get it working. There was a bug in Automation Anywhere that eventually got solved just a few weeks back. However, we have not implemented it. We have had hiccups with the single sign-on, but otherwise it was a smooth setup. We are not using single sign-on because of this bug."
"Selenium has been giving us failures sometimes. It is not working one hundred percent of the time when we are creating elements. They need to improve the stability of the solution."
"We do not have enough resources or enough people to employ and hire. So, I'm hiring whoever I find, and they don't always have enough technical knowledge to operate Selenium."
"If the test scenarios are not subdivided correctly, it is very likely that maintenance will become very expensive and re-use is unlikely."
"We'd like to see some more image management in future releases."
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
"I would like to see some reporting or test management tools."
"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
"In the beginning, we had issues with several test cases failing during regression. Over a period of time, we built our own framework around Selenium which helped us overcome of these issues."
Automation Anywhere (AA) is ranked 3rd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 491 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 103 reviews. Automation Anywhere (AA) is rated 8.4, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Automation Anywhere (AA) writes "Automation Co-Pilot enables us to present details from CRM for business management on one page". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Automation Anywhere (AA) is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Blue Prism, Tricentis Tosca and WorkFusion, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test. See our Automation Anywhere (AA) vs. Selenium HQ report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
