AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Workload Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
4,585 views|2,398 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
9,418 views|7,029 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 11, 2023

We performed a comparison between Automic Workload Automation and AutoSys Workload Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Features: Automic Workload Automation is highly praised for its robustness, scalability, and implementation simplicity. It provides control over various operating systems and products. AutoSys Workload Automation is valued for its scalability, user-friendly interface, and quick execution.

Automic Workload Automation needs industry-standardization and plug-and-play automation processes, improved language support, better functionality, a user-friendly interface, an enhanced web-based edition, and more competitive pricing. AutoSys Workload Automation users want integration with cloud services, easier reporting and comparison of job performance, better Linux environment integration, improved file transfer job handling, advanced features and functionalities, and the ability to monitor and manage workload windows.

Service and Support: Automic Workload Automation's customer service has received both positive and negative feedback. Some customers appreciate the prompt response and informative knowledge articles, while others have faced challenges in contacting the support team. AutoSys Workload Automation's customer service is highly acclaimed, with users describing it as excellent, helpful, and responsive. The support team is perceived as competent and equipped.

Ease of Deployment: Automic Workload Automation's setup duration varies from one to five days. AutoSys Workload Automation boasts a quick and uncomplicated setup process, requiring only 10 minutes or less. The simplicity of the setup may be influenced by the user's familiarity and needs.

Pricing: Automic Workload Automation offers pricing based on the number of systems being orchestrated, which is considered expensive yet still affordable compared to similar solutions. AutoSys Workload Automation involves a yearly subscription and an annual license, with costs for agents and server setup that can vary.

ROI: There is a lack of ROI information for Automic Workload Automation. AutoSys offers various advantages including heightened productivity, enhanced efficiency, cost savings, improved visibility and control, and decreased downtime. However, the actual ROI may differ depending on factors like company size and workload complexity.

Comparison Results: Automic Workload Automation is highly recommended due to its impressive strength, scalability, and effortless implementation. Users appreciate its extensive range of features and intuitive interface. Automic's versatility in managing various operating systems and products is particularly valuable for environments that contain a blend of outdated and modern technologies.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It enables us to build automation which is flexible in a controlled environment.""I use this automation solution, because it is very flexible. This automation solution supports a lot of computer platforms. Also, a lot of operating systems are supported other than automation solutions.""They just talked about adding support for hundreds of thousands of agents, and I know it goes up to about a thousand clients per engine, so you can do a lot with that. It's a very scalable solution.""It helps our efficiency because it is a batch processing tool which works without a menu.""The most valuable features are the predefined templates for application-specific jobs and the access for different users.""We have two nodes that are highly available. You can add new nodes if you need that. You can take a node, a total node, down and still be operating fine. It has a lot of scaling to it.""It has its own object-oriented scripting language and you can reload your object in many different places.""It will increase all delivery due to an impact on efficiency, in terms of time and faster resources."

More Automic Workload Automation Pros →

"The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs.""Inherit Dependencies feature reduces scheduling errors for holiday processing.""Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language.""It is very valuable for us when we are trying to arrange or orchestrate jobs into a system. It is helpful for triggering jobs for a scheduled task.""​It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers.​""The solution has been stable.""It has helped to simplify cross-dependency between MVS and Open systems jobs.""This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Pros →

Cons
"Today, we use a rich client for this product. In the future, or for the next release, they will be using a web interface. This web interface is not as scalable as the rich client for us. The web client is not 100 percent programmed as we need it.""The user interface has room for improvement.""There has to be a better way to visualize things in the application without having so many windows open.""Most of our issues are related to the system, not the job scheduling, such as, bugs and unexpected downtime of the application or database.""The search is sometimes a little bit slow.""I should be able to grant a user access to execute a job without having to directly list every include, prompt set, output scan, script, login, etc. An inherited read for execution purposes would accomplish the same results without making the admin list every single object every time, as well as deny the user the ability to edit.""We would like to have some features with the AWI with the founding technique, which cannot currently be delivered.""I'm not sure what data they use to make time estimates. However, most of the time it is not accurate. It's either way too long or way too short."

More Automic Workload Automation Cons →

"We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement.""Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types.""Ease of implementation for upgrades.""​A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that.​""An area for improvement in AutoSys Workload Automation is that it lacks advanced features or advanced built-in functionalities found in competitors, for example, an advanced workflow feature. Even the handling or notification from AutoSys Workload Automation isn't the best in the industry. Other products have very good workflow-related functionalities such as ActiveBatch that's missing in AutoSys Workload Automation, so I wish the tool had those features.""​The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement.""Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier.""The visibility and control features are somewhat limited."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Automatic is heavily integrated in our organization. The cost to change would be a huge factor for us, and we have not found any other product that is better out there."
  • "Do your own proof of concept. Make sure you know what you want. Be clear about what you want the product to do for you. Go out and meet with the vendor, then test it."
  • "The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."
  • "It costs to scale. While, it is scalable, the add-ons are expensive."
  • "It has helped us reduce costs."
  • "You do not need any humans to start jobs, so you can save a lot of money."
  • "We have received a lot of time and cost efficiencies from using the product."
  • "We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive."
  • More Automic Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Validate how many agents you need beforehand."
  • "CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."
  • "People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."
  • "I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."
  • "It is overpriced."
  • "The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."
  • "There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."
  • More AutoSys Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.
    Top Answer:The solution was flexible in terms of pricing. We're moving away from it, not due to price, but rather based on our requirements. They did provide us with an unlimited license that matched our budget.
    Top Answer:The AI capabilities and predictive modeling aren't very good. I don't see a future for that. It's very basic. That's part of the reason we moved to Stonebranch. They have more analytic capabilities… more »
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    4,585
    Comparisons
    2,398
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    673
    Rating
    8.5
    6th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    9,418
    Comparisons
    7,029
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    468
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Automic Dollar Universe
    CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
    Learn More
    Overview

    Broadcom's Automic Workload Automation (AWA) stands out as a robust and advanced solution in the field of workload automation and orchestration. Designed for complex enterprise environments, it enables organizations to automate, manage, and optimize their IT workflows and business processes. This solution is particularly beneficial for IT professionals and business executives seeking to enhance operational efficiency, reduce manual workload, and drive digital transformation.

    Automic Workload Automation offers a unified platform for managing diverse tasks across various environments and applications. This centralization simplifies the orchestration of workflows, enhancing visibility and control. IT professionals appreciate this feature as it allows for streamlined management and more efficient resource utilization. AWA's architecture is designed to scale with the growing demands of businesses. It supports a broad range of applications and platforms, making it a versatile tool for different IT environments.

    AWA's analytics and reporting capabilities provide deep insights into workflow performance and potential bottlenecks. This aspect is particularly valuable for data-driven decision-making, helping organizations to optimize processes and improve overall efficiency. The ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide array of applications, databases, and systems, facilitates smooth and automated workflows across various IT landscapes, crucial for enterprises that utilize a mix of legacy and modern applications.

    Automic Workload Automation users on PeerSpot.com have highlighted several strengths; IT professionals frequently commend its robust scheduling capabilities, noting that it handles complex dependencies and scenarios with ease. The intuitive user interface is also frequently mentioned, simplifying the task of managing and monitoring automated workflows. Business executives, on the other hand, appreciate the solution's contribution to strategic business initiatives, such as digital transformation and cloud migration, due to its advanced automation capabilities.

      AutoSys Workload Automation delivers end-to-end visibility of application workloads and dependencies across platforms, ERP systems, and the cloud. Thanks to event-based triggering, real-time alerting, and dynamic critical path management, business applications are ensured for availability.

      By intelligently and effectively assigning workloads based on real-time information about the available computing resources and service level agreements, AutoSys Workload Automation scales to enterprise demands with ease. The solution permits businesses to swiftly provision and handle workloads in physical, virtualized, and cloud environments.

      The platform helps to reduce the cost and complexity of managing mission-critical business processes, ensuring consistent and reliable service delivery. AutoSys Workload Automation is a job control solution that allows you to manage workloads via a command-line interface (CLI) or graphical user interface (GUI).

      AutoSys Workload Automation Features

      AutoSys Workload Automation has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

      • Multi-platform scheduling: Manage and visualize a process end to end across multiple platforms from a central point of control.
      • Extensive scalability: Provide production scalability without the need for multiple server instances.
      • Extensive app support: Manage workloads for business apps such as PeopleSoft, SAP, and Oracle E-Business. This results in lower operating costs and increased cross-enterprise visibility.
      • Built-in fault tolerance: Robust, lights-out operations with automated recovery that facilitates the availability of business systems by enabling jobs to be completed accurately and on time.
      • Self service: End-users have the ability to request and execute workload processing that is controlled by workload policy and governance processes. This gives businesses more control over their own services.
      • Security and compliance: Better meet regulatory compliance requirements by defining access permissions at any level. If there are problems, you can view what was changed, by whom, and at what time.

      AutoSys Workload Automation Benefits

      There are many benefits to implementing AutoSys Workload Automation. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

      • Job scheduling, monitoring, and reporting: Jobs can be scheduled across platforms. When a job enters different production schedule phases, keep track of it and give reports.
      • Create reports that ease regulatory compliance and improve control.
      • Forecasting is used to detect and comprehend the business impact of work within a job stream. You can send notifications for overdue tasks or bypass less critical jobs.
      • Managing resources: The solution assesses the resources that are available and schedules jobs to achieve a defined SLA, enhancing resource utilization.

      Reviews from Real Users

      AutoSys Workload Automation stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its file transfer protocol and its visibility for batch processing. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

      One PeerSpot reviewer, an IT consultant at a computer software company, writes, “The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs.

      Another PeerSpot reviewer, a head at an insurance company, notes, “It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good. It also gives us the ability to connect different software processes.”

      Sample Customers
      ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB
      Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm29%
      Manufacturing Company13%
      Retailer11%
      Insurance Company11%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm21%
      Computer Software Company11%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Retailer7%
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm46%
      Insurance Company14%
      Energy/Utilities Company11%
      Healthcare Company6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm46%
      Manufacturing Company12%
      Computer Software Company6%
      Insurance Company5%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise17%
      Large Enterprise67%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business14%
      Midsize Enterprise11%
      Large Enterprise75%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business12%
      Midsize Enterprise6%
      Large Enterprise82%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business9%
      Midsize Enterprise7%
      Large Enterprise84%
      Buyer's Guide
      AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation, AppWorx Workload Automation and IBM Workload Automation, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation report.

      See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

      We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.