We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the visual interface of AWS Glue."
"AWS Glue is a good solution for developers, they have the ability to write code in different languages and other software."
"I also like that you can add custom libraries like JAR files and use them. So, the ability to use a fast processing engine and embed basic jobs easily are significant advantages."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"It is AWS-integrated. There is end-to-end integration with the other AWS services. It is also user-friendly."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"The solution is serverless so it allows us to transform data while optimizing the cost and performance of Spark jobs."
"It's fairly straightforward as a product; it's not very complicated."
"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."
"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"It integrates well with various servers."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"
"In terms of improvement, the performance of AWS Glue could be faster."
"I have encountered challenges with multi-region support."
"Overall, I consider the technical support to be fine, although the response time could be faster in certain cases."
"While working on AWS Glue, I could not find any training material for it."
"It is not clear how the partition discovery would have been affected by more data coming in."
"The mapping area and the use of the data catalog from Glue could be better."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"There should be more connectors for different databases."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, SSIS and Talend Open Studio, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS. See our AWS Glue vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
