We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and StackPath WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry."
"I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to integrate central sets. It protects from intrusion attacks such as scripting and SQL injections."
"The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,"
"AWS has flexibility in terms of WAF rules."
"Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."
"It is Amazon. Everything is scalable. It is beyond what we need."
"Rule groups are valuable."
"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."
"Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"The solution could improve by having better rules, they are very basic at the moment. There are more attacks coming and we have to use third-party solutions, such as FIA. The features are not sufficient to prevent all the attacks, such as DDoS. Overall the solution should be more secure."
"In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler."
"The serverless product from AWS WAF could be improved. For example, they have only one serverless series, Lambda, but they should extend and improve it. Additionally, the firewall rules are not very easy to configure."
"AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."
"In a future release I would like to see automation. There's no interaction between the applications and that makes it tedious. We have to do the preparation all over again for each of our other applications."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while StackPath WAF is ranked 27th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while StackPath WAF is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas StackPath WAF is most compared with Sucuri.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.