We performed a comparison between Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration and IBM B2B Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The automation of all the data transfers is great."
"Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration has a great user interface that is easy to understand."
"It's highly stable, and the redundancy is amazing. B2B Integrator also has a high availability option to work in a cluster environment. You rarely have issues operating it because of the HA."
"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"I find the codeless communications, SFTP or FTP, valuable."
"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."
"The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility."
"B2B provides a secure communication channel."
"The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."
"The solution offers good integration capabilities."
"The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator."
"The initial setup can be a bit tricky."
"The user interface is outdated. B2B Integrator was developed in the United States in the nineties, and the graphical user interface hasn't improved since. It's tough because you have to program the software in XML. Nowadays, other methods are easier to work with."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."
"There should be a single place to do things, rather than making it complicated, not moving away and truncating the old features but instead coming up with the new and still keeping the old stuff confuses people sometimes."
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."
"API-Fication required, and there should be more clarity on their cloud migration strategy."
"There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry."
"The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor."
More Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is ranked 12th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 2 reviews while IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is rated 7.6, while IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration writes "Simplifies processes, has helpful support, and offers useful automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, whereas IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, SAP Process Orchestration and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI). See our Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. IBM B2B Integrator report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
