We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and Harbor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"Feature-wise, the security model and access controls are pretty straightforward and valuable"
"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."
"One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure."
"Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks."
"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"We like the fact that this is a secure solution, that employs a token-based system, which can be used to manage all the applications under this product."
"Right now this is the leading product in this category."
"The solution could always improve its security measures with regard to access."
"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."
"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."
"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."
"The setup process is mildly complex. There is no straightforward management platform, so there's a level of complexity to it."
"We have found that it is sometimes difficult to pull images from the host application."
"They can improve their scalability."
"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."
"The GUI needs to improve."
"The product should integrate better with other storage options."
Earn 20 points
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while Harbor is ranked 2nd in Container Registry. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while Harbor is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harbor writes "Check document vulnerabilities with this cloud-native product that needs to improve in ease-of-use". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Red Hat Quay, whereas Harbor is most compared with JFrog Container Registry, Red Hat Quay, Amazon ECR, VMware Harbor Registry and DigitalOcean Container Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.