We performed a comparison between Azure DNS and Infoblox DDI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Managed DNS solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Integration with other Azure services is good."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The tool is easy to manage and use."
"The best feature is the domain register. The other great feature is that whenever you create any resources, Azure DNS will automatically create a record for you."
"From a security perspective, Microsoft is much better than other cloud providers."
"It is a very stable solution."
"Azure DNS is a user-friendly and very easy-to-manage solution."
"If you're running your enterprise application on Azure, it's convenient to use Azure DNS. It has native integration with other Azure solutions, and Microsoft is a globally recognized DNS provider. You also get CDN services. If you're a media company that requires on-demand data streaming, your DNS plays a vital role by working with CDN services to publish your application. It's cheaper and easier to expand your solution."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"Infoblox DDI prioritizes DNS security, which is crucial for the security department."
"Infoblox DDI is a good tool if you want to centralize everything in your environment...It is a stable solution."
"Infoblox has more technology patents than any of its competitors."
"The best feature is the user interface."
"The most valuable feature of Infoblox DDI is its IP Address Management (IPAM) tool. This tool allows for the effective management of IP addresses and provides the capability to detect duplicates, hence its moniker "discovery." Another feature that I find particularly useful is the integration of DNS, which can be seamlessly integrated with your existing primary DNS server, making the overall experience much more seamless and efficient."
"The CDN integration could be improved."
"The scalability could improve."
"The web interface to manage the solution must be made easier."
"The support from Microsoft in India is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The pricing can be more competitive."
"Azure DNS' documentation needs to improve."
"Azure needs to add domain registration to the DNS service."
"The DNSSEC feature is not yet available on the DNS server so it needs to be added."
"They need to reconsider their pricing for their SMB customers. It is a hurdle for them to manage the price."
"The solution is expensive."
"The recategorization part takes longer with Infoblox DDI compared to other companies like Symantec, Zscaler, and Palo Alto."
"They need to provide more training and tutorials than what's provided on the website."
"Regarding an upcoming release of Infoblox DDI, I would like to see an improvement in the existing integration with Ansible. Currently, the integration is not up to par and requires further enhancements, particularly in Ansible version 2.5. Additionally, the GUI is slow, it could be improved."
Azure DNS is ranked 2nd in Managed DNS with 31 reviews while Infoblox DDI is ranked 8th in Managed DNS with 6 reviews. Azure DNS is rated 8.4, while Infoblox DDI is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Azure DNS writes "Offers good performance and helps its users with disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infoblox DDI writes "An excellent tool that provides an overall centralized view of everything in an environment, majorly the security part". Azure DNS is most compared with Amazon Route 53, Cloudflare DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Google Cloud DNS and Quad9, whereas Infoblox DDI is most compared with BlueCat Integrity, VitalQIP, Cisco Network Registrar, Cloudflare DNS and Amazon Route 53. See our Azure DNS vs. Infoblox DDI report.
See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.
We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.