We compared Barracuda Intronis Backup and MSP360 Backup across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Barracuda Intronis Backup is praised for its strong backup capabilities, user-friendly cloud management portal, and staff training opportunities. MSP360 Backup offers a convenient way to track successful backups and detect any missing ones, eliminating the need for manual verification.
Room for Improvement: The Barracuda Intronis Backup could improve its integration, speed, and orchestration capabilities. The users say MSP360 Backup could benefit from improved integration, an expanded knowledge base, and faster restore time.
Service and Support: Customers have consistently praised Barracuda Intronis Backup for their excellent and knowledgeable technical support. However, some reviewers reported challenges with escalation and communication within the support team. Users say MSP360 Backup has good technical support, but some reported that the level of detail required for the backup process is challenging.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Barracuda Intronis Backup is simple and involves configuring IP settings and connecting to Cloud Control. Some reviewers have said that the setup process for MSP360 Backup is easy, while others found it complex.
Pricing: Barracuda Intronis Backup provides a comprehensive and reasonably priced setup package. MSP360 Backup is considered reasonably priced and cheaper than competing solutions, but there are additional costs for storage space.
ROI: Barracuda Intronis Backup provides added financial benefits and time efficiency. Users provided no feedback on the ROI of MSP360 Backup.
Comparison Results: Barracuda Intronis Backup stands out for its extensive training resources and direct cloud mapping, but users would like to see better performance and integration. MSP360 Backup has a user-friendly interface, supports consumer cloud drives, and offers good technical support, but some users have faulted the solution for its lack of integration and long restore times.
"The most valuable features are the deduplication that analyzes data to identify duplicate patterns and granular restore."
"Its interface is intuitive, and it is easy to use when I am restoring files. Barracuda does a really excellent job at compression, which makes it very efficient. Eight years later, I am only halfway through to the capacity, which is very good."
"The product is easy to install and use while doing what it is expected to do."
"The most important feature in Barracuda Backup is the ability to archive the backup of emails."
"The backup feature is most valuable. That's why we took it."
"The most valuable feature is unlimited data storage on the cloud. Even if the employee has left the company for a few years, the backup will still be maintained."
"Whenever you have a crash or your service is not working, you can just live-boot the machine and have your service up and running."
"Most important is its ease of use. You plug it in, follow the steps, and you have your backup file."
"The UI is pretty good. It's very simple. That is one thing that we like about this. It's very user-friendly."
"It has allowed me to implement a cost effective, highly configurable solution."
"Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end."
"General ease of use and performance of the Windows version is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is easy to access and handles things efficiently."
"Technical support is very good."
"Block level transfers have significantly reduced the amount of time for transfers over some other solutions"
"I was mainly concerned with cloud backups, OneDrive backups, consumer OneDrive, business OneDrive, Google backups, and SharePoint backups. The solution did a good job of the backup."
"The web interface needs to contain a more up-to-date view of the hardware."
"It is not always stable."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see cloud support and deduplication functionality."
"I would like to see a way to increase space."
"Barracuda works great for smaller network environments, which are not that complex. It is hardware-based with a Linux core, which you don't have access to, and a lot of stuff happens on the back-end. Even from a troubleshooting perspective, it is a bit challenging."
"The solution is pretty expensive. This is the usual customer complaint."
"It would be nice to have some reports generated on the usage, but it is not essential."
"Barracuda Backup could use some more integration."
"The main improvement is that it should have GDPR compliance. That's the problematic point. They say they are GDPR compliant, but they are not."
"The restore time could improve. When we had an issue the restore time was lengthy."
"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."
"There are some things that we don't like about it. That is why I was exploring alternatives in a hyper-scale environment. That is why I was checking IT Central Station."
"The Linux GUI leaves a lot to be desired. It lacks many of the features of the Windows version and is buggy, but it is still usable."
"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."
"The product could be more user-friendly."
"The interface feels like it is targeted for end users who typically are looking for an all-in-one integrated push button solution. It would be better if the interface had a beginner mode and an expert mode."
Barracuda Intronis Backup is ranked 5th in MSP Backup with 24 reviews while MSP360 Backup is ranked 2nd in MSP Backup with 15 reviews. Barracuda Intronis Backup is rated 8.4, while MSP360 Backup is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Intronis Backup writes "Finding data to restore is much easier than rummaging through tapes to find backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MSP360 Backup writes "The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support". Barracuda Intronis Backup is most compared with Rubrik, Veeam Backup & Replication, Acronis Cyber Protect and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), whereas MSP360 Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, N-able Cove Data Protection, Acronis Cyber Protect, NinjaOne and Comet Backup. See our Barracuda Intronis Backup vs. MSP360 Backup report.
See our list of best MSP Backup vendors.
We monitor all MSP Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.