We performed a comparison between BigID and Informatica Axon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable feature is correlation. Using BigID's data classification capabilities has strengthened our data security. It lets me classify and connect data, which helps me manage data at various classification levels."
"BigID integrates well with our other products."
"One of the most valuable things in a data-focused world is a tool, a technology that's data-centric, not trying to master data management or whatever else. It's a source of truth for what data an organization holds, giving it the ability to catalog, categorize, and understand its data."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the user experience, the credentialing, and that BigID is user friendly. Additionally, you can deploy to several other Microsoft platforms and you can use it for other things, like a bigger element or a report."
"I like BigID's in-depth discovery and scanning capabilities, especially for unstructured data. This feature is a standout compared to competitors. The tool's data classification capabilities are impressive. It offers custom classifiers and a blend of regular exploration and artificial intelligence, making it a next-generation solution. This enhances data security, and its security posture management is straightforward and user-friendly."
"BigID's scanning feature is its most valuable component."
"The data classification offered by the tool can help companies improve their security strategy"
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon has been the data marketplace."
"Axon does one interesting thing that I don't think other tools do as well. It lets you rate data and incorporates Informatica's data quality feature into it. There are little indications and graphics that show you how good the data quality is, and you can drill into it to see where potential issues lie."
"Axon has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has, so they can request access. That's one feature we use extensively. Axon also offers great visibility and intuitive searchability, allowing you to easily search data assets. You can check the lineage and see the work EDC does. EDC handles all the classification, cataloging, and lineage. It's integrated with Axon, and anyone can see that."
"The product is stable."
"The solution offers good data governance."
"The features for data quality, data cataloging, and UI are excellent."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon is that it is flexible and user-friendly."
"The dictionary, the search, and the ratings are without a doubt the most beneficial components of this solution."
"In terms of what could be improved, when you're looking in a BigID file, you cannot really get the whole file. You have to export it to download it to another platform that allows you to completely view it, or run a program. That was one of the things that was really a disappointing point for me. Not to be able to view everything. There's a lot more data, but you can't get it all at once."
"The challenge we encountered was with data connection across multiple databases. We struggled with configuring the data connection successfully. However, with the assistance of dynamic teams, we resolved this issue."
"BigID is making some forays into the GRC space, and that's a natural progression. I'd like to see that improve so that data governance is better, data risk is identified, and the ability to control and mitigate it."
"More classifications about different states are needed"
"The tool currently lacks security features."
"BigID is expensive. I prefer McAfee."
"Improvement could be made in data consent management and data privacy impact assessment."
"The solution should improve its integration."
"It would be great if the cloud version could match the full range of capabilities available on-premise."
"I would like to see more API integration to have the capability to build a report using other third party reporting tools to streamline the operation."
"The solution still is a bit manual in its functionality. We want t to be more automation-driven."
"In terms of what could be improved, they need to create a rules repository. Business rules for the attributes that you have, keeping them in that central repository, and governance of them is something which Axon is lacking a bit. The Informatica Data Quality tool actually caters to that, so that's probably why they have not built that up in the Axon, but it is definitely something that can be built in to this product, as well."
"There are also some technical issues sometimes with integrations because clients have a lot of different types of data sources."
"The on-prem version's functionalities may not be available on the cloud version."
"Right now, although they offer some templates, I would want more templates available to be imported."
BigID is ranked 7th in Data Governance with 7 reviews while Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews. BigID is rated 8.0, while Informatica Axon is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BigID writes "Commendable and robust data-centric tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". BigID is most compared with Varonis Platform, Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Cyera , Collibra Governance and Alation Data Catalog, whereas Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, erwin Data Intelligence by Quest and Microsoft Purview Information Protection. See our BigID vs. Informatica Axon report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.