We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The stability is very good."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The solution is probably one of the top five, best security solutions on the market at the moment."
"The most valuable features are the solution's thorough detection and ease of use."
"One strong point is that it doesn't have many background services running on the Windows system or server operating system. This minimizes impact because it's a lighter version."
"We have had no issues with the support and consider it to be good, even when it comes to accredited resellers."
"The tool alerts about lateral internet movements."
"One of the most valuable features is the signature updating in near real-time."
"It is a good anti-malware product that is highly stable."
"I like that you can manage all the time and you can uninstall and install everything via the web console."
"It works well and the performance is good."
"We mainly use this solution because we have many Fortinet solutions like antivirus and SSL assessment."
"The VPN has proven to be quite useful."
"From my perspective as an end user, it's consistently stable, and I would rate the stability as a nine out of ten."
"The service is centralized."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its integration capabilities. The processing is fast and the reporting is also very good."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The integration capabilities are good."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"They were working on the encryption management for laptops, and if they complete it then it would be helpful."
"Their ransomware remediation doesn't respond as fast as BullWall does...Ransomware control needs to be improved."
"If we could directly push the agent to the script, it'll be very good."
"Application Control should be available on the cloud."
"The only problem we have, and I don't know if maybe it's the package we bought, is that it lacks the parts of data protection and application blacklisting."
"The solution wasn't designed to be used in France."
"The interface could be improved."
"There is a need to work on the deployment, when it comes to deploying to Windows machines with regards to downloading the size of the package."
"The quality and response time of the support team must be improved."
"The features of Fortinet FortiClient could be improved."
"The solution can improve by adding new remote console or endpoint features to make the solution easier to use."
"I have yet to find the benefits of the latest upgraded version."
"The only thing that is lacking in this product is the support. Their support can be improved."
"The filtering process could be improved."
"Fortinet needs to cover more areas where threats can come from."
"The solution should have faster turnaround when it comes to new technology."
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 56 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 14th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 86 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Ivanti Connect Secure. See our Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Fortinet FortiClient report.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.