We performed a comparison between Box and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that Box makes it easy to deploy virtual machines."
"The sharing feature, with its various permission settings, such as viewing or uploading, is convenient and helpful."
"Governance and ease of use are why I think a lot of people like Box, including ourselves. Basically, we're concerned about what information is being sent to Box, so we use a lot of the Box governance features to make sure that what is being sent to Box is appropriate. If it is not appropriate, it is not allowed to be sent. It is also pretty easy to use. It is the easiest to use for customers and for technologists."
"Office Integration. The full integration into the Microsoft Office products is just perfect."
"Using Box for cloud storage allows us to focus on the service and maintaining infrastructure."
"Sharing and collaborating across files and folders has been a massive game changer."
"The solution is scalable."
"The system's performance is impressive, and file sharing is notably straightforward."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"I would love to see the ability to invite collaborators extended to a file level, not just the folder level."
"The integration with other products should be improved."
"The solution's data security should be improved."
"Maturity of the enterprise security around user management."
"If you want to delete something in Box, you have to do it manually, one by one. That was my recent experience. They might have a bulk delete, but I could not find that option. If you want to delete something, you have to go to each and every file and delete it."
"I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward."
"The search features and role permissions are not very user friendly. It only searches the first few pages of a document, which is quite a problem."
"They could integrate better with other platforms."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
Box is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 39 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Box is rated 8.4, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Box writes "Allows you to upload and download files quickly but lacks integration with Office 365". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Egnyte, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco. See our Box vs. Oracle Content Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Document Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
