We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller."
"One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is a good product for cloud management."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"It is easy to deploy, and it is not that complicated. There are a lot of systems that are very complicated, and they require a special kind of training. Their response is also very slow, especially with the Chinese vendors, but with Cambium, we have not faced any issues. Everything is going well in terms of cooperation from Cambium. We are happy with them, their services, their cooperation, and their quick response. They are just amazing."
"Technical support has been good."
"The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."
"The deployment access in the local system is about 200 access points. External access points is more. The number is huge. There about 1,000 users in total."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"The performance of this solution is amazing in terms of radiofrequency technology."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution."
"The technical features are very good and it's very useful if you need a wireless solution."
"We use things like VLAN and all the multibeam features that are built in, but at the end of the day, the most important thing for us is to get a good signal and site-wide coverage."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN’s most valuable feature is unleashed."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points."
"If someone wants to go to the location-based portal of the product, like the one available in Meraki, it would not be possible, and it is an area that needs improvement."
"They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"Pricing is an area for improvement. The devices are relatively expensive."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"I have some friends who have not heard of Ruckus, but are aware of other competitors."
"What needs improvement in Ruckus Wireless WAN is the initial setup. It could be easier. Availability is also another area for improvement in the product. Another huge disadvantage of Ruckus Wireless WAN is the cost you must continuously pay for the licenses."
"The solution could use a better user interface."
"I would like to see IoT device support available with WiFi six. IoT is used by all businesses. They are now using IoT devices. It is required."
"It would be nice to some analytical features built into this solution."
"The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.