We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"Cassandra has some features that are more useful for specific use cases where you have time series where you have huge amounts of writes. That should be quick, but not specifically the reads. We needed to have quicker reads and writes and this is why we are using Cassandra right now."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."
"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"The technical evaluation is very good."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"Interface is not user friendly."
"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."
"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."
"Cassandra could be more user-friendly like MongoDB."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"Maybe they can improve their performance in data fetching from a high volume of data sets."
"The solution is limited to a linear performance."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, SingleStore, ScyllaDB, Accumulo and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
