We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The technical evaluation is very good."
"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"A consistent solution."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."
"We can add almost one million columns to the solution."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"The tool performs well."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."
"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"Cassandra could be more user-friendly like MongoDB."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"Interface is not user friendly."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The installation is difficult."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"The licensing model is bad."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Chroma, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.