We performed a comparison between Cegid and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud HCM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The solution has a great payroll engine."
"We have features such as ABKRS based on the client's requirement, tariff and TMSTA, and so on."
"It is a scalable solution. There are three administrators maintaining the solution: an HR person, a payroll person, and one backup."
"We have managed to consolidate our payroll for all India operations on this platform."
"We are satisfied with the reporting by SAP HCM."
"HCM is a very important module that each organization should want to use. It will help any organization to calculate and control the cost of their human resources."
"The valuable features of SAP HCM include managing employee data from hiring to retirement."
"They have some interesting features in the learning space."
"The payroll and time management features are useful."
"training and performance could be improved."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"SAP now does the most innovation for the cloud solution and less innovation for the on-premises client."
"Managing changes in applications can be challenging since it complicates testing and unit testing, resulting in longer testing phases. This time-consuming process often leaves little room for actual work."
"The limitation of HCM compared to new-era human capital management solutions is the cost."
"This solution needs to be more configurable and user-friendly."
"The product's license is very expensive."
"SAP is not ready to sell the license on time and delays the progress of projects. It's better to work with a competitor like Oracle. Those that are selling the product just go through powerpoints and don't have the knowledge necessary to sell. They can't answer any questions."
"SAP HCM could improve by having more resources and making it more user-friendly. It is complex."
"It is a bit tedious and manual to work with."
Cegid is ranked 18th in Cloud HCM with 12 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 3rd in Cloud HCM with 48 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Allows you to generate reports, easy integration and offers out-of-the-box support". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, UKG, BambooHR and Workday, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and ADP Workforce Now. See our Cegid vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Cloud HCM vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.