We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to administer and easy to deploy. It has automated or pre-configured templates, security features, and proactive threat detection."
"The user interface is responsive and quite intuitive; when selecting an object it automatically shows the relevant actions."
"The solution has intelligence that integrates with a range of threat intelligence feeds, including Check Point's ThreatCloud, to provide real-time intelligence on emerging threats."
"It has an analytics service that does research for us."
"We know the vulnerability in advance, so we can take some action for that vulnerability."
"The reporting is quite good. It is the most powerful aspect of this solution."
"Checkpoint posture management gives you visibility across your entire cloud infrastructure, so it helps you with management, maintenance, and compliance. With visibility across all these cloud platforms, you can protect against compromised credentials or identity theft."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"PingSafe's graph explorer is a valuable tool that lets us visualize all connected services."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"The most valuable feature of PingSafe is its integration with most of our technology stack, specifically all of our cloud platforms and ticketing software."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"Cloud Native Security's best feature is its ability to identify hard-coded secrets during pull request reviews."
"PingSafe offers an intuitive user interface that lets us navigate quickly and easily."
"PingSafe offers comprehensive security posture management."
"I would like to see Test B functions at the application access level."
"The tool has a lot of potential, but today, it lacks a lot of Scripts/Bots for Azure."
"Addressing the large amount of compliance information and benchmarks we need to observe, the tools are becoming our goto dashboards."
"Reporting should have more options."
"The main issue that we found with Dome9 is that we have a default rule set with better recommendations that we want to use. So, you do a clone of that rule set, then you do some tweaks and customizations, but there is a problem. When they activate the default rule set with the recommendations and new security measures, it doesn't apply the new security measures to your clones profile. Therefore, you need to clone the profile again. We are already writing a report to Check Point."
"Their service needs improvement."
"The setup can be better. With every other Check Point product, the setup is scripted. You just approve versions, and then you are off. The setup for this solution is still very much manual. I would like to see that transition to more of a scripted setup."
"I’d like to see more integration with third-party tools. For example, it would be helpful to have an integration between Dome9 and ServiceNow to manage security incidents and security changes."
"One area for improvement could be the internal analysis process, specifically the guidance provided for remediation."
"I would like PingSafe's detections to be openly available online instead of only accessible through their portal. Other tools have detections that are openly available without going through the tool."
"PingSafe can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
"I'd like to see better onboarding documentation."
"Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"After closing an alert in Cloud Native Security, it still shows as unresolved."
"One of the issues with the product stems from the fact that it clubs different resources under one ticket."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 4th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 64 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 5th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 67 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Sysdig Secure. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors, best Vulnerability Management vendors, and best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.