We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Tenable.sc based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.sc excels in detecting vulnerabilities with its advanced scanning and prioritization features. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, on the other hand, offers a wide range of data security features such as governance and administration portal panel. Tenable.sc has room for improvement in various areas such as penetration testing, pricing, reporting, GUI, and support. On the other hand, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management needs better reporting, investigation, customization, and integration.
Service and Support: Tenable.sc has received positive feedback for their customer service, although there have been reports of delayed responses. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has received mixed reviews, with some customers satisfied with their support while others feel it could be better.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.sc's setup is easy and straightforward, while Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management's setup may require vendor support or multiple administrators. Tenable.sc's on-prem version involves significant integration, while CloudGuard's difficulty may depend on the connection to cloud systems.
Pricing: Tenable.sc charges based on the number of IP addresses scanned, while Check Point bases it on the size of the cloud infrastructure. Check Point's setup cost is generally seen as affordable and easy, while opinions on Tenable.sc's pricing vary.
ROI: Tenable.sc saves on manpower and has a positive ROI while Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is more expensive but provides security and compliance solutions that can lead to a 35% ROI growth rate.
Comparison Results: Tenable.sc is the favored option when compared to Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management according to user feedback. Tenable.sc has more advanced scanning capabilities, vulnerability ratings, and a risk-based approach compared to its competitor. While Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management offers valuable features such as data security and automated remediation, users have suggested that it needs improvement in areas such as reporting options, false positives, and pricing.
"Dome9 wraps our FTP infrastructure with its network security configurations, and this also gives us the ability to monitor FTP activity."
"The dashboard is intuitive. You know if you're compliant or not, and then it gives you a remediation plan."
"The solution offers an excellent price, benefit, and installation relationship."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"Overall, it provides good security."
"The system has deployed security tools to enhance effective investigations in the entire company networking system."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is the training."
"The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"Tenable.sc's best features are the availability model, accident management, and scoring."
"It's a very useful tool."
"We really love the Security Center dashboard. It basically performs vulnerability scanning and then outputs a vulnerability data."
"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."
"The solution has a lean and easy-to-use interface that is not confusing to first-time users."
"Initial setup was pretty straightforward."
"Has a great advanced scanning feature."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"The rules are not well-tuned, and many of them generate false positives or nonsensical results."
"The guidelines to implement or to link with the clouds are not complete."
"We have concerns regarding the pricing and would appreciate seeing some improvements."
"I would like to see some AI on the back-end, just to assist with doing analysis and making recommendations."
"Reporting should have more options."
"The technical support could be better, but I do not know of any other needed improvements."
"I would like an interface more adapted to cell phones or tablets."
"I would like them to include support for their products in languages other than English."
"The solution's user interface has some issues."
"The user interface can be improved."
"We experienced some difficulties with the solution’s support."
"The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time."
"In terms of configuration, there is some level of flexibility that we are not able to achieve."
"The web application is not very functional."
"Support could be faster."
"The product should provide risk-based vulnerability management."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 6th in Vulnerability Management with 64 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Horizon3.ai. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.