We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a highly scalable solution with a quick turnaround time for deployment and running of the software across any IT system."
"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."
"It offers high performance and improved productivity for users."
"The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspection."
"The tool performs device health checkups and updates us. It helps us to be compliant with regulatory policies."
"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."
"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."
"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."
"From my point of view, it is the best product on the market."
"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."
"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."
"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."
"Checkmarx has helped us deliver more secure products. We are able to do static code analysis with the tool before shipping our code to production. When the integration is in the pipeline, this tool gives us early notifications on code fixes."
"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."
"A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."
"I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service."
"I have faced issues with the tool's blocking aspects. It is hard to open or block web services due to the multitude of cloud centers. I have to do the process manually at times. We have a bug which is hard to solve."
"I would like to be able to integrate the theme of Artificial Intelligence to help review issues and to monitor and view the security issue while also suggesting and interpreting and additionally configuring solutions - basically, acting as an interpreter."
"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security needs to improve updates on integrations. It also needs to incorporate real-time monitoring features."
"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."
"One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support."
"They should improve in the delivery of more detailed reports with more information."
"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."
"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."
"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."
"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."
"We can run only one project at a time."
"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."
"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."
"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while Checkmarx One is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube, whereas Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
