We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and CloudPassage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The visibility is the best part of the solution."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"The UI is very good."
"PingSafe offers comprehensive security posture management."
"I like the fact that having granular information about the potential threats is received in email."
"The solution helps to block spam emails."
"Its total protection has been the greatest aspect since it completely protects all the mail from the cloud."
"It is fast and has a very simple, easy integration."
"It is fast and quite effective in terms of preventing any security incidents."
"The ease of management and intuitive administration are excellent."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the phishing protection it offers."
"It is the collaboration between users inside the company. It is a big advantage with Check Point to be able to work together on the same document."
"Key features are the Software Vulnerability Assessment and the CSM, which is the configuration check."
"Policies are very easy to manage on a day-to-day basis."
"We've found a lot of false positives."
"When we get a new finding from PingSafe, I wish we could get an alert in the console, so we can work on it before we see it in the report. It would be very useful for the team that is actively working on the PingSafe platform, so we can close the issue the same day before it appears in the daily report."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"PingSafe is an excellent CSPM tool, but the CWPP features need to improve, and there is a scope for more application security posture management features. There aren't many ASPM solutions on the market, and existing ones are costly. I would like to see PingSafe develop into a single pane of glass for ASPM, CSPM, and CWPP. Another feature I'd like to see is runtime protection."
"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."
"If I had to pick a complaint, it would be the way the hosts are listed in the tool. You have different columns separated by endpoint name, Cloud Account, and Cloud Instances ID. I wish there was something where we could change the endpoint name and not use just the IP address. We would like to have custom names or our own names for the instances. If I had a complaint, that would be it, but so far, it meets all the needs that we have."
"The cost has the potential for improvement."
"It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process."
"They could help us be integrating features with solutions from third parties."
"I would love it if they would do some work on the Postgres definition on the back-end."
"A signature-based filter could improve the solution's AI model for spam email."
"Since the portal to the management and administration entry sometimes has performance problems and takes a long time to respond to what has arrived, the handling of the tool is difficult."
"There could be more automation features included for it."
"The product's pricing needs improvement."
"They could improve Check Point support response times. Sometimes it takes days to resolve or even days to get a first response."
"Support can be a bit quicker in helping the customer."
"In the CSM module the policies are really hard to work with it. It is not very flexible at all. I would suggest that they change that. Right now, the scan is based on the group that the server is in. What happens if the server is in multiple groups?"
"The reports and graphs are unintuitive."
"Of all the advertised functions, I only find two things that really work in my environment, even though I wanted to use all of them. They're not flexible enough to be used."
"Anything outside of the software vulnerability management and the CSM, things like the GhostPort, need some improvement. The dashboard is in beta. It looks really good, I wish it would come out of beta."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 9th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 49 reviews while CloudPassage is ranked 41st in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.6, while CloudPassage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloudPassage writes "CloudPassage has a bunch of features. Be sure you understand all of them and how to extract value to your organization". Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security and Cisco Secure Email, whereas CloudPassage is most compared with . See our Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs. CloudPassage report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.