We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Fortify WebInspect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two DevSecOps solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apart from software scanning, software composition scanning is valuable."
"The most valuable feature for me is the Jenkins Plugin."
"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."
"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the automation and information that it provides in the reports."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."
"The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."
"The solution is easy to use."
"When we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities. Comparison is easy in SSC."
"The accuracy of its scans is great."
"I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level."
"Fortify WebInspect is a scalable solution, it is good for a lot of applications."
"There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to make our customers more secure."
"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."
"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."
"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."
"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."
"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."
"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."
"Our biggest complaint about this product is that it freezes up, and literally doesn't work for us."
"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."
"One thing I would like to see them introduce is a cloud-based platform."
"Fortify WebInspect's shortcoming stems from the fact that it is a very expensive product in Korea, which makes it difficult for its potential customers to introduce the product in their IT environment."
"The scanner could be better."
"We have had a problem with authentification."
"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."
Checkmarx One is ranked 2nd in DevSecOps with 67 reviews while Fortify WebInspect is ranked 8th in DevSecOps with 17 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Fortify WebInspect is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortify WebInspect writes "A powerful tool catering to multiple use cases that provides reasonably good technical support". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand and Snyk, whereas Fortify WebInspect is most compared with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Fortify on Demand, Acunetix, OWASP Zap and Rapid7 InsightAppSec. See our Checkmarx One vs. Fortify WebInspect report.
See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.
We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.