We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the Jenkins Plugin."
"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"The ability to track the vulnerabilities inside the code (origin and destination of weak variables or functions)."
"The UI is user-friendly."
"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."
"The product helps our team collaborate across different locations."
"Our code is secure."
"The most valuable feature is the source code management. It's very helpful and it's a great product."
"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."
"The product has a very user-friendly interface and user-friendly security."
"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."
"The ease of use is valuable."
"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."
"Checkmarx needs to improve the false positives and provide more accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities. It misses important vulnerabilities."
"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."
"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."
"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."
"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."
"GitHub's issue management could be improved a little from an organization standpoint. It would be helpful to have the ability to organize a work board or a backlog more comprehensively. For organizations migrating to GitHub from arbitrary systems, it's a little bit of a headache to move on to that system."
"There could be more integration into Azure."
"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."
"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."
"Could be more user friendly."
"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."
"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."
"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while GitHub is ranked 12th in Application Security Tools with 74 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and GitLab, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Fortify on Demand, Bitbucket and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our Checkmarx One vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
