Checkmarx One vs NowSecure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Checkmarx Logo
31,565 views|20,243 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
NowSecure Logo
541 views|334 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and NowSecure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application.""The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled.""It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security.""The most valuable feature for me is the Jenkins Plugin.""The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time.""The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks.""It is very useful because it fits our requirements. It is also easy to use. It is not complex, and we are satisfied with the results.""The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."

More Checkmarx One Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the ability to download an application without actually putting in the APK. It gives us an option to put the APK in if we want to but we can download it from the App Store and Play Store."

More NowSecure Pros →

Cons
"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy. Right now, it requires a SQL database, and the way the tool works is that it has an engine and then it has an analysis database in which it stores the information. So, it is pretty heavy from that perspective because you have to have a full SQL Server. They're working on something called Checkmarx Light, which is a slim-down version. They haven't released it yet, but that's what we need. There should be something a little more slimmed down that can just run the analysis and output the results in a format that's readable as opposed to having a full, really big, and thick deployment with a full database server.""I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service.""Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation.""Checkmarx being Windows only is a hindrance. Another problem is: why can't I choose PostgreSQL?""Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline.""The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode.""As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to.""There is nothing particular that I don't like in this solution. It can have more integrations, but the integrations that we would like are in the roadmap anyway, and they just need to deliver the roadmap. What I like about the roadmap is that it is going where it needs to go. If I were to look at the roadmap, there is nothing that is jumping out there that says to me, "Yeah. I'd like something else on the roadmap." What they're looking to deliver is what I would expect and forecast them to deliver."

More Checkmarx One Cons →

"In this solution, there are two kinds of testing, static analysis, and dynamic analysis. There needs some improvement in testing with dynamic analysis because I have found it is not accurate"

More NowSecure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is the right price for quality delivery."
  • "I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."
  • "The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."
  • "The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."
  • "It is a good product but a little overpriced."
  • "The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."
  • "​Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."
  • "We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."
  • More Checkmarx One Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
    Top Answer:Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
    Top Answer:The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    31,565
    Comparisons
    20,243
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    508
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    541
    Comparisons
    334
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 52% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Snyk logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Coverity logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 27% of the time.
    Data Theorem API Secure  logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    Acunetix logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Learn More
    NowSecure
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

    Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

    • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
    • API security
    • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
    • Container security
    • IaC security
    • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
    • Codebashing secure code training
    • AI security
    • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
    • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

    Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

    NowSecure experts have conducted advanced pen testing for some of the world's most demanding organizations - including banks, insurance companies, government agencies, healthcare organizations, retail conglomerates, high-tech businesses, and more. Mobile apps are prone to sensitive data leakages and attacks, yet a manual test for just one app can take several weeks. To enable faster, more frequent testing, we built a test engine that successfully automates repeatable and time-consuming mobile appsec testing, remediation and reporting tasks. The result - the foundation of the NowSecure platform, which significantly reduces testing time and costs without compromising full depth of security coverage.

    Sample Customers
    YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
    Vaporstream, FIS, MEA Financial, Silent Circle, Capital One, Citi, EY, EMC, Emerson, Kaiser Permanente, The Home Depot, Humana, Shell, Kellogg's, TD Bank, VMware
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Hospitality Company8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 67 reviews while NowSecure is ranked 33rd in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while NowSecure is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NowSecure writes "Scalable and reliable, but dynamic analysis needs improvement". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas NowSecure is most compared with Veracode, Data Theorem API Secure , Acunetix and GitLab.

    See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.