We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"The UI is user-friendly."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."
"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."
"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."
"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities. It's one of the key features they provide that's an excellent selling point. They're always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"Checkmarx could be improved with more integration with third-party software."
"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."
"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy. Right now, it requires a SQL database, and the way the tool works is that it has an engine and then it has an analysis database in which it stores the information. So, it is pretty heavy from that perspective because you have to have a full SQL Server. They're working on something called Checkmarx Light, which is a slim-down version. They haven't released it yet, but that's what we need. There should be something a little more slimmed down that can just run the analysis and output the results in a format that's readable as opposed to having a full, really big, and thick deployment with a full database server."
"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."
"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."
"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Checkmarx One is ranked 4th in API Security with 67 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 8th in API Security. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare. See our Checkmarx One vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.
See our list of best API Security vendors.
We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
