We compared Zabbix and Checkmk based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Zabbix stands out for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customization options, and excellent customer service, while Checkmk is praised for its monitoring capabilities, reporting options, and ease of use. Zabbix users commend its performance and flexibility, while Checkmk users appreciate its ease of navigation and detailed reporting. Both products offer reasonable pricing and positive ROI, but Zabbix users suggest improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities, while Checkmk users seek enhancements in user-friendliness, documentation, alerts, and scalability.
Features: Zabbix stands out for its extensive customization options, while Checkmk impresses with its comprehensive reporting capabilities. In addition, Zabbix offers robust performance and intuitive dashboards, while Checkmk provides real-time insights and customizable reports.
Pricing and ROI: Zabbix offers a reasonably priced solution with a flexible licensing model, while Checkmk has found to be reasonable and affordable. Zabbix emphasizes a straightforward setup process, whereas Checkmk offers an easy setup process without any associated costs. Both products have received positive feedback from users regarding their setup cost., Zabbix users praise its performance and customization options, helping improve efficiency and prevent costly incidents. Checkmk users report significant improvements in monitoring efficiency and effectiveness, resulting in time and cost savings.
Room for Improvement: Zabbix users request improvements in user interface, documentation, customization options, and integration capabilities. Checkmk users express concerns about interface design, documentation, alerting system, scalability, and performance in larger networks.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Zabbix and Checkmk indicate that the time required to establish a new tech solution varies among users. Some users of Zabbix spent three months on deployment and a week on setup, while others required a week for both deployment and setup. Checkmk also had users reporting varying durations, with some taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, and others taking only one week for both. The context in which users use the terms "deployment" and "setup" should be considered when evaluating these timeframes., Zabbix's customer service is highly praised for their promptness, helpfulness, and strong commitment to resolving issues efficiently. Checkmk's customer service is appreciated for their prompt response, helpful assistance, and reliable solutions.
The summary above is based on 28 interviews we conducted recently with Zabbix and Checkmk users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."
"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."
"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."
"I really like the auto-discovery feature."
"Zabbix is a cost-effective solution. We're a small organization with a few dozen devices to monitor, and it was available for free. We can see what we need. We haven't done an in-depth analysis on it, but we're currently okay with the product."
"It's a flexible solution."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of virtual machines."
"The solution is stable."
"It provides high scalability, alerting, notification, templating, and end-to-end security."
"It has an intuitive UI with beautiful graphs and customizable maps."
"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."
"We use it to monitor and manage our servers."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."
"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."
"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."
"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."
"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Improvement is needed as per customer requirements."
"Zabbix isn't a great tool for cloud-specific monitoring - its connection to public clouds needs to be improved. Other areas for improvement would be the lack of dashboards and integrations."
"I think the reporting part of Zabbix can be improved in terms of more user-friendly graphics to display the collected data. Many simple users who don't know how to use Zabbix properly might get confused by the reporting, although at the same time it is very versatile for my company."
"There are some features of Zabbix that are not good for reporting. The DX Spectrum solution has better reporting."
"In the next release, I'm hoping for features targeted towards larger users with more customizable options. Despite this, I think pre-canned reports that can be used straight out of the box would be beneficial rather than having to configure each report individually. Additionally, a deeper dive into software configurations on the machines would be useful, although I understand there may be challenges in implementing this due to scripting requirements. More documentation would also be appreciated."
"In terms of user-friendliness, large maps could be more interactive. We should be able to click on some areas and move some objects. It would make it simpler to see things while analyzing some dedicated parameters."
"The event correlation could be better."
"Zabbix could improve when it comes to large-scale use cases. Additionally, the inventory could be better when connecting to other solutions, such as ServiceNow. There show to be better integration with other platforms and storage."
Checkmk is ranked 21st in Network Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. Checkmk is rated 8.6, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Checkmk writes "A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Checkmk is most compared with Icinga, Netdata, Centreon, Observium and Nagios XI, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core, Nagios XI and Amazon CloudWatch. See our Checkmk vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best Server Monitoring vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.