We performed a comparison between Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cisco Security Portfolio solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to handle. You can have it on Windows, Linux or Mac, that's quite useful."
"The most valuable features are that it is really secure and very easy to use."
"It does not slow down anything, unlike other solutions."
"The solution has good performance. It is a simple tool to use, once I turn on Windows it automatically starts to use the VPN."
"I like how I don't need to see the solution or start it up. I just use my computer and have it working in the background. I start my laptop and it's there and working. That's the most important feature."
"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is good for securing our connection. It is very easy to use, I click to use it and it works."
"The ability to connect to the VPN remotely."
"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is very stable."
"I like the logging feature."
"The endpoint profiling feature is among the most valuable because it keeps me from having to manually maintain a MAC address bypass list to track endpoints. I can have ISE profile them for me and then put them in the right bucket."
"It offers automatic profiling of phones and computers, enabling administrators to identify and categorize devices seamlessly."
"Technical support is okay."
"It's flexible and stable. It's been good as a standard environment to run."
"The ability to integrate our Cisco AnyConnect connections to the active directory has been great."
"The way we can trust this solution is the most valuable. We have no issue with this product. It is a competitive product. You need to have a very good and deep knowledge of the product to take the full benefits of all the features, but it is a good product."
"The solution cuts down on the repercussions of getting malware or ransomware."
"I would like a faster connection from the solution."
"I would like to see improvements in regards to the connectivity speed."
"Complicated scenarios are difficult to deploy. On a scale from one to ten, with one being the most difficult, I'd give a rating of between two and three for the initial setup."
"The logout should be automized and it should have a reminder that you have logged in into a private network."
"We'd like the product to be cheaper."
"The cost could always be a bit less."
"There is nothing they need to improve at this moment."
"The price could be reduced."
"An issue with the product is it tends to have a lot of bugs whenever they release a new release."
"It is a good product, but in order to use all of the functions of the product, you must have a good understanding of the product. You must know how to use and manage it. It is a little bit complicated to configure and manage. It must be simplified to make it easy to manage for end users. In the initial stage, we found ISE complicated for end users. It was not easy to manage it or to write authentication and authorization protocol. They must improve its management and make it easy for end users. The monitoring and reporting capabilities can be improved because end users want to quickly see what is happening in their network. There were some restrictions in working with other vendors. It should also have a better and easy integration with other vendors."
"One of the issues that we used to have was with profiling because we're working with a service provider that uses a lot of bring your own devices."
"It could be less monolithic. It's one huge application, and it does everything under the sun, so it's hard to deal with and upgrade and manage."
"The support could be faster and the pricing could be reduced."
"The ISE software needs to be improved so that it is easier to administer."
"They should improve the upgrades. It's not easy to upgrade the solution."
"I'd like to see an easier way to upgrade to larger versions, as well as more best practices that are easier to locate on their support page."
More Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is ranked 6th in Cisco Security Portfolio with 69 reviews while Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Cisco Security Portfolio with 138 reviews. Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is rated 8.6, while Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client writes "A stable solution that helps users connect to resources when working from home". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange and SonicWall Netextender, whereas Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Genian NAC. See our Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client vs. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) report.
See our list of best Cisco Security Portfolio vendors.
We monitor all Cisco Security Portfolio reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.