We performed a comparison between Citrix ShareFile and Google Cloud Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."It's user-friendly for end users."
"Easy to manage and fully secure."
"The Enterprise Dropbox solution is highly integrated with Microsoft's Office 365 and Azure products."
"This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords."
"ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution."
"The solution is scalable."
"The solution would query the Active Directory, and if new accounts were identified, Citrix ShareFile would add them automatically."
"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
"The solution is already stable and I have not encountered problems in this regard."
"The solution is scalable."
"What I like most about Google Cloud Storage is that it's very stable, very quick, and very useful."
"The solution's customer service and support are helpful since they are responsive...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The best feature is ease of use."
"We are mostly doing telephony and generic web services in the telephony."
"It is seamlessly integrated with your Android. There’s no fuss, no hassle."
"It is flexible and simple to use."
"My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved."
"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode."
"DLP features are lacking and required because, especially with everyone working from home, security is now paramount when the data is on BYOD devices."
"The user interface is not very intuitive."
"There are sometimes scalability issues after updates."
"Everything they have should be integrated into one item."
"The configuration on the mobile devices is a little clunky, in terms of setting up the application."
"They should integrate the solution with more email services."
"The problem I face right now is that my data warehouse is being hosted on Google Cloud, however, integration between Google Cloud to Microsoft Azure is a big problem."
"Google Cloud Storage can improve by having better integration and migration tools."
"Google Cloud Storage could be improved if they provided more free storage for free accounts."
"It would be better to assign storage usage to different categories, because storage capacity is cumulative, if your Google album and email are both full, you will be unable to send or receive email."
"My use case of this solution is fairly minimal. However, I am concerned about privacy on a cloud platform. Many people are not migrating to a cloud service because they are still concerned about putting data in cloud-based storage."
"Google Cloud Storage could improve by being more user-friendly."
"Google Cloud Storage could improve by increasing the storage from 15 GB. If I want to have more storage I need to pay extra money."
"I would like to see this solution made faster, cheaper, and bigger."
Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews. Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4, while Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Box, Dropbox and Microsoft OneDrive, whereas Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Microsoft Azure File Storage and Google Workspace.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
