We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
Comindware Tracker is ranked 36th in Process Automation while IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 35th in Process Automation. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with . See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.