We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The platform appeals to companies spanning many industries on a global scale."
"The solution has helped out organization gain improved visibility."
"We rely heavily on the API crawlers that Datadog uses for cloud integrations. These allow us to pick up and leverage the tags teams have already deployed without having also to make them add them at the agent level."
"I like the amount of tooling and the number of solutions they sold with their monitoring. Datadog was highly intuitive to use."
"Datadog agents act as an integration to different services, providing easy access and management."
"Flame graphs are pretty useful for understanding how GraphQL resolves our federated queries when it comes to identifying slow points in our requests. In our microservice environment with 170 services."
"The ability to easily drill down into log queries quickly and efficiently has helped us to resolve several critical incidents."
"Datadog has a lot of features to be able to drill down deep into the swath of logs that our platforms generate."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"Graph filters for logs need to be set manually which works well for JSON but not for unstructured logs."
"It would also be nice if we had more insight into our own usage of Datadog (agents and custom metrics). They provide a usage page which does help, but it is not in real-time."
"The product needs to have more enterprise approach to configuration."
"While I like the ease of use, when compared with Tenable Nessus they could still improve their usability."
"Some of the interface is still confusing to use."
"Datadog is expensive."
"It can be overwhelming for new people as it has a lot of features."
"We'd like Datadog to make the log storage cheaper."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Coralogix is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and OpsRamp. See our Coralogix vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.