We performed a comparison between Cornerstone Learning and SAP SuccessFactors Learning based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SAP SuccessFactors Learning is praised for its exceptional catalog and seamless integration with other solutions. Cornerstone Learning earned high marks for its extensive library of training modules, flexibility, and automated management of employee information. SAP SuccessFactors Learning needs improvements to its mobile application and user management features. Cornerstone Learning requires more self-service capabilities, better reporting, and more e-learning content.
Service and Support: Some customers say SAP support provided timely technical assistance, while others struggle to communicate with the team. Generally, Cornerstone Learning provides satisfactory support with prompt response times, but some customers reported delays and inconsistent quality.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for SAP SuccessFactors Learning can be difficult and intricate, particularly when transferring learning items from a previous system. Cornerstone Learning's difficulty varies based on the organization's complexity.
Pricing: SAP SuccessFactors Learning is a costly solution. Users must pay an initial fee for implementation and annual support fees. This can be a burden on small businesses. Cornerstone Learning is priced reasonably and competitively, but customers may incur additional costs for ad hoc engineering and setup.
ROI: The effectiveness and returns of SAP SuccessFactors Learning and Cornerstone Learning differ based on factors like organization size and implementation goals. Cornerstone Learning helped organizations improve training management, auditing, tracking, and presentation. However, it's difficult to quantify the platform's ROI in financial terms.
Comparison Results: SAP SuccessFactors Learning is preferred over Cornerstone Learning. Users appreciate its modern user experience, strong catalog, and seamless integration with other solutions. SAP SuccessFactors Learning excels in resource allocation and access functions, making tasks easier with fewer clicks. Cornerstone Learning was criticized for its complicated and confusing user interface, lack of flexibility in curriculum management, and limited content creation capabilities. Users consider SAP SuccessFactors Learning to be competitive in the market, offering technical advantages for enterprise solutions.
"Its user-friendly interface is most valuable. You can configure your welcome page and design it the way you want on your own."
"The Meeting feature is similar to a conference call facility that can be used for virtual meetings."
"The most valuable features of Cornerstone Learning are the welcome page and the learner's home. It is user-friendly and graphically appealing."
"The most valuable features of Cornerstone Learning are how extensive the configurable the solution is."
"It's better than the previous learning solutions we had. We liked that it was global. We liked that you don't have to be logged into the company network to be able to use it. Those were really big benefits for us."
"The solution is very stable."
"Combining everything together, our on-time completions have gone from the mid-sixty percentile to over 99% on-time completion."
"It is a one-stop shop solution, where you can actually log in using your Windows username and password, and the single sign-on can be configured with this LMS."
"The learning features are great."
"The analytics and reporting features are very helpful."
"The product offers a lot of information which we can share with systems."
"It is a very stable tool. It is the most stable security application."
"The best feature of SAP SuccessFactors Learning for me is the assignment profile. It's a rather specific feature, but this is what comes to mind."
"The most valuable feature is the smooth integration."
"One valuable aspect of SAP SuccessFactors Learning is its stability and established customer base, particularly evident in modules like Employee Central."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning's most valuable features are accessibility and updated UX. The solution can be accessed from outside of the office network and the user's experience is good."
"There is a need for quite a bit of improvement. The reporting side of things definitely needs a lot of improvement. At the moment, it gives you a data dump. You have to open it up in Excel and filter out the bits that you don't want and need."
"Cornerstone Learning's initial setup was complex, but I don't see that as a downside. It was complex because there is a lot of customizing and a lot of settings that can be done in the setup."
"The existing test functionality is really old-fashioned, basic, and limited."
"A minus is that Cornerstone doesn't provide the admin the ability to create their own content for learning. So, you can just manage the content."
"Even though the system has a number of features, design wise the user interface is a little bit complicated. It is hard for the user to navigate properly. Because the system has so many features, it has a lot of tabs and links. Sometimes, people get confused as to where to go and search."
"Cornerstone Learning can improve reporting. If they had a harmonization of the administration UIs it would be great."
"In the next release, I would like to see a Hybrid architecture and to be able to customize the look and feel."
"Cornerstone Learning could improve the curriculum function by giving it more flexibility. I'm managing the solution and I adding content to the system, and overall, the backend of the system looks a bit dated. Cornerstone Learning has focused a lot on the user experience and less on the backend operational administrative experience. This could be improved overall."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning's e-learning portal has a very poor interface when compared to Cornerstone or PeopleFluent. It's a very basic interface, but I know that it has a very good foundation."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning doesn't have a punch-in and punch-out facility."
"The certifications are valid for only six months."
"This solution does not support right to left for the Arabic Language, and the Arabic text support is very bad."
"The GUI and dashboards are areas in the solution with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"What needs improvement in SAP SuccessFactors Learning is the user interface. The user management and the integration of the whole suite could also be improved. The solution also needs to be modernized because at the moment, it's a little bit outdated. It's old-fashioned, and though it has a data import feature, that's just plain outdated. SAP SuccessFactors Learning doesn't have any cutting-edge features."
"The consultants implementing this solution could be more knowledgeable."
"The product's configuration process needs improvement."
Cornerstone Learning is ranked 5th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 28 reviews while SAP SuccessFactors Learning is ranked 4th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 24 reviews. Cornerstone Learning is rated 8.2, while SAP SuccessFactors Learning is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cornerstone Learning writes "Scalable LMS that keeps up with industry trends with continuous new releases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors Learning writes "An easy-to-deploy and stable solution helpful for multiple HR-related activities". Cornerstone Learning is most compared with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM Cloud, LinkedIn Learning and UKG, whereas SAP SuccessFactors Learning is most compared with Moodle, Workday, Litmos, INX +LMS and Wombat Security Education Platform. See our Cornerstone Learning vs. SAP SuccessFactors Learning report.
See our list of best Learning Management Systems (LMS) vendors.
We monitor all Learning Management Systems (LMS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.