We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Falcon and NetWitness XDR based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon stands out for its minimal impact on system performance, optimal resource utilization, and precise detection of threats. CrowdStrike Falcon could benefit from adding a sandbox feature and more detailed firewall management options. NetWitness XDR is commended for its prompt threat response, seamless integration capabilities, and user behavior analytics. Users say NetWitness XDR could improve its threat intelligence and investigation. Some suggested updates to its reporting engine.
Service and Support: CrowdStrike Falcon's customer service is considered prompt and helpful. NetWitness XDR provides effective 24/7 technical support. While some were satisfied with the response times, others experienced delays of up to 48 hours.
Ease of Deployment: CrowdStrike Falcon's setup is considered to be simple and efficient, with deployment times ranging from a few days to a month. While there may be some challenges during installation, they are generally manageable. Some users found the initial setup of NetWitness uncomplicated, but others faced challenges.
Pricing: Some users find CrowdStrike Falcon costly and think the price should be lowered to make it more competitive. The total cost of NetWitness XDR depends on the environment and the number of endpoints. Larger users can receive discounts, but users say the solution might be too pricey for smaller companies. NetWitness XDR provides various licenses, including some that feature premium support.
ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon offers cost savings by decreasing the required number of engineers and eliminating the need for onsite servers. NetWitness XDR has demonstrated positive outcomes by improving threat detection capabilities and facilitating digital forensics.
Comparison Results: CrowdStrike Falcon is favored over NetWitness XDR. Users like Falcon's lightweight design, machine learning capabilities, UBA features, and reliable cyberattack detection. The solution also earned praise for its integration with other systems and accurate threat detection. NetWitness XDR users mentioned difficulties with the initial setup and slow performance. CrowdStrike Falcon is considered reasonably priced, while NetWitness XDR is seen as expensive.
"It has been great for us. Previously, we didn't have a solution to protect us, especially from malware, whereas now, we are getting protection up front, especially from the malware attacks coming through emails or endpoints."
"The Endpoint Manager is incredible; it has a very straightforward interface and is exceedingly easy to use. Pulling out and deploying different tags or resources is a simple task across various departments with different levels of security. The notifications are also simple and satisfying; it's great to see the bubble informing us which devices are compliant and which are waiting to update."
"The integration between all the Defender products is the most valuable feature."
"I like that it's fully integrated with Windows, Microsoft 365 Exchange Online, and Outlook. It is better than other antivirus solutions because it's fully integrated with all Microsoft products. It's easy to integrate them and onboard all Windows devices from SCCM."
"All of the security components are valuable including, antiphishing, antispam, and stage three antivirus."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that Microsoft Defender XDR is easy to integrate with other Microsoft platforms or products."
"It's a very scalable tool that can be used in a very small environment or in a very large environment. Everything can be managed from a simple dashboard and can be scaled up or down depending on the customer's environment."
"It has great stability."
"The stability is good; we haven't experienced any glitches or bugs."
"The most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon are the AI in detecting and real-time detections."
"This solution consistently releases improvements. They have communicated their next two years of development which is powerful and covers all of our needs."
"Its integration capability is valuable. It integrates easily with any OS."
"I value the overall behavior analysis of CrowdStrike. The engine of this product is what drew us to this solution."
"We are happy with CloudStrike's ease of use and touch notification."
"It provides very good protection and the ability to crosscheck environments."
"One of the most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon is when there are upgrades there are no additional fees."
"The interface of this solution is very flexible and easy to use."
"It is stable. We have been using it for some time, without any issues."
"It's a scalable solution. We have around five to eight customers using RSA NetWitness Endpoint, and we hope to increase the number of users."
"NetWitness Endpoint's most valuable features are its interoperability across many different operating systems and the ease of pivoting from network to endpoint via a single console."
"This solution allows us to locate the malware in real-time."
"RSA NetWitness does market analysis in a more granular form. It gives you full visibility."
"The log correlation is good."
"Ability to isolate the machine when there are malicious files."
"Microsoft Defender XDR is not a full-fledged EDR or XDR."
"The capability to not only thwart attacks but also to adapt to evolving threats is crucial."
"The advanced threat-hunting capabilities are phenomenal, and the security copilot enhances that, but some data elements could be better or have more context inside of the advanced tables themselves. The schemas feel a little limited to what they're building into the product. It's probably just a maturity thing. I imagine we'll see the features I want in the next year."
"The solution does not offer a unified response and standard data."
"The console is missing some features that would be helpful for a managed services provider, like device and user management."
"The design of the user interface could use some work. Sometimes it's hard to find the exact information you need."
"Intrusion detection and prevention would be great to have with 365 Defender."
"There are still some components, such as vulnerability management within the vendor product, where improved integration would be beneficial."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities."
"The dashboard does not have the facility to export the reports in a PDF format, which I can quickly share with internal stakeholders."
"I would like CrowdStrike to provide some correlation in the threat analysis, so we can visualize things better."
"The solution could improve by providing more types of reports because it's in the detection span you cannot re-export anything. If it could be exported to a CSV file directly there it would help a lot. I currently need to do this by API to get what I need."
"They respond quickly on the weekdays, but the weekend response times are slower."
"We would like to be able to perform on-demand scanning, rather than relying on the scheduler."
"The overall cost of CrowdStrike Falcon could be reduced."
"They offered a white glove service that was extremely costly. When we got into it, we saw it was relatively easy. If I was being nitpicky, I'd say that I don't like being sold something that's unnecessary. That's the only downside I've seen to the solution."
"The integration of the solution needs to be improved. The dashboard needs lots of updates as well. In the next release, we would like to see advanced fraud detection features."
"The contamination feature could be improved."
"Threat detection could be better."
"The deployment process is complex. I don't know why, but this solution will suddenly stop working. Logs stop coming. Often, one thing or another stops working. Most of the time, one of my team members is working with troubleshooting and working with technical support. Log passing is also one of the biggest challenge."
"When analyzing something, you have to click several times. It requires a lot of effort to find something."
"This solution needs an upgrade in reporting. I have heard from RSA that they are working on this, but as of yet it is not available."
"The solution lacks a reporting engine."
"Its price could be improved. It is an expensive product. Its training is also too expensive. It would be great if they can have a better pricing scheme for the training."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 1st in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 107 reviews while NetWitness XDR is ranked 17th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 15 reviews. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while NetWitness XDR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetWitness XDR writes "Beneficial single unified dashboard, good native application integration, and high availability". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, Trend Vision One and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas NetWitness XDR is most compared with Darktrace, ExtraHop Reveal(x), SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Vectra AI. See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. NetWitness XDR report.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors, best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
