We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"This tool has test data management capability along with test management."
"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"The mainframe testing and UI automation are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"What I find valuable is that Tricentis is always refining the test methodology. They listen to feedback from the analysts about what the testing tool should do, and then Tricentis always implements it. So all the necessary testing functions are already implemented in their tools."
"It is easy to maintain and easy to automate. No coding skills are required to automate. It is also easy in terms of transferring knowledge and skills. Many of my team members shifted over the past one and a half years, and there was no big issue with respect to knowledge sharing. It is a good tool that enables me to re-automate my scripts and update my scripts as quickly as possible. Looking at the amount of rework and maintenance activity that we had done for our scripts, it might have been a nightmare with some other scripting tool."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"While the initial setup was straightforward, we required assistance with the configuration to ensure that everything was done correctly."
"It can be quite expensive."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"The Test Management options are still weak - improvement is outlined, but not yet visible. I"
"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."
"The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 98 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.