We performed a comparison between CyberGRX and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The interface is simple to use."
"The most valuable feature of Qualys Container Security is the detailed information in the reports and the remediation. This is done to make sure there are no vulnerabilities."
"Intuitive and easy to use."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"This solution gives us insight into our environment and improves our security. It helps us to maintain a good patching system whereby we know that XYZ is vulnerable within the system."
"Qualys VM's best features are vulnerability management and customizable scoring."
"Qualys VM's most valuable feature is automatic detection."
"The process of defining and discovering scans is organized efficiently."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"There are not many partners for this product in India, which makes the OEM very difficult to reach."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"We are moving away from Qualys to Defender ATP because I find that Defender ATP is much better at prioritizing the vulnerabilities that I should be looking at."
"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
"Improve the API speed."
"The price could be better. Asset view is still a legacy feature. I'm not able to extract the information about the asset with complete details. It would be better if they fixed that in the next release. I know Qualys is already working on it, so I'm hopeful it will be available in the next five or six months. That would be something that's changed where I seek improvement."
Earn 20 points
CyberGRX is ranked 61st in GRC while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. CyberGRX is rated 6.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberGRX writes "Scales well and technical support is good, but it is expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". CyberGRX is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.