We compared ExtraHop Reveal(x) and Darktrace based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: Based on the comparisons between ExtraHop Reveal(x) and Darktrace, ExtraHop Reveal(x) has a more complex setup process requiring coordination and involving multiple teams, while Darktrace's setup is generally considered simple and straightforward. ExtraHop Reveal(x) is praised for its advanced features and user-friendly interface, while Darktrace's biggest strength lies in its ability to autonomously detect and monitor threats. ExtraHop Reveal(x) could improve in terms of agent management, integration partners, and pricing, while Darktrace could benefit from reducing false positives and enhancing usability. Darktrace is often seen as expensive, whereas pricing reviews for ExtraHop Reveal(x) vary. ExtraHop Reveal(x) has had a significant positive impact on operations and offers strong customer support, while Darktrace excels in monitoring, protection, and providing insights into network activity, with customers expressing satisfaction with its customer service.
"Technical support is helpful and responsive."
"It provides a comprehensive, detailed view of network activity and whatever is happening inside it."
"I like the dashboards, which are cool. They are more user-friendly, in my experience. Its learning capabilities are really good."
"Provides great network protection."
"The product can scale."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to give insights into network traffic."
"The most valuable feature of Darktrace is the AI that detects abnormal network activity."
"I particularly like Antigena and the analytics around the real-time monitoring of our network. I also like its reporting because it has got a seven-day reporting period within the system. Every time you run the reports, it gives you the data about the previous seven days. I like that because it is in real-time. I enjoy reading those reports and getting a very clear and decisive idea of what's happening on my network on a real-time basis. I like the actual real-time monitoring of spoofing and things like that. I also like the user monitoring as well as the network logging capabilities."
"The solution works well for sending sensors."
"The most valuable features of ExtraHop Reveal(x) are the detection and alerting of network behavior and anomalies."
"Reveal X integrates seamlessly with CrowdStrike. If you see something sketchy on the network, you can quarantine devices through ExtraHop and it'll push to the CrowdStrike server."
"ExtraHop Reveal(x) is one of the tools that works out of the box when it comes to threat hunting."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The solution's ability to decrypt SSL traffic is its most valuable feature."
"It's a wire analytics tool. We use it for isolating and determining issues on our network or applications. It does a lot for crediting the network as opposed to discrediting the network. A lot of people come along and say that it's a network issue. It's always considered to be a network issue, but by using ExtraHop, we can quickly tell them that it's not a networking issue. It's something to do with your application or something at the other end. It could be a database issue. This tool gives us the ability to pinpoint with great accuracy the comings and goings on our network."
"Setting up the solution is relatively easy."
"Darktrace could improve its features, such as monitoring and detecting ransomware."
"Darktrace could improve by being more user-friendly."
"The module can improve so that every time it's more intelligent."
"In the next version, I'd like to see penetration testing."
"It could build in integrations for some complementary products, but it has an assistant plugin so this is not really a big deal."
"The pricing is a bit high for the region."
"In an upcoming release, there could be more customizable playbooks or a library of playbooks to choose from."
"It's quite expensive to have."
"The solution is expensive and gets more expensive if a company needs to scale it."
"ExtraHop Reveal(x) could improve by allowing a longer look back in the feature. Right now you have a limit of 30 days to look back on your activity. I've used Darktrace before, and they allow you the ability to play back events. This would be a good feature to have in ExtraHop Reveal(x)."
"Netflow - Processing Netflow can be cumbersome as it requires triggers to truly gain value and insight. This in turn can add a bit of load to the hardware. The focus of ExtraHop Reveal (x) is live packet data."
"I think the tuning capabilities could be improved. We're working on minimizing false positives. Apart from that, everything seems fine to me."
"The solution's reporting part and GUI are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The solution should include more support protocols."
"There is a little training online, but it'd be cool if ExtraHop provided certifications. CrowdStrike does elective training that gives you a certification as a Falcon administrator. It'd be nice to see ExtraHop have something like that"
Darktrace is ranked 1st in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 65 reviews while ExtraHop Reveal(x) is ranked 5th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 12 reviews. Darktrace is rated 8.2, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Darktrace writes "Great autonomous support, offers an easy setup, and has responsive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ExtraHop Reveal(x) writes "It helps you visualize how data moves across your network". Darktrace is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Vectra AI, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Rapid7 InsightIDR, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) is most compared with Vectra AI, Corelight, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Arista NDR and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360. See our Darktrace vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) report.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors and best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.