We performed a comparison between Denodo and Teradata QueryGrid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."The most valuable aspects of this solution are the short time frame in which you can deliver and connect."
"Denodo's best features are its performance, easy data transformation, and the job scheduler."
"The most valuable features are query optimization and the single language independence from the sources we're using to catch data."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"The best thing about Denodo is that creating and deploying a web service can be done in about 10 minutes, compared to a whole day when it comes to other solutions (such as when deploying with Java and AWS)."
"Denodo makes it easy to export data as a service or data link to other services."
"In PL/SQL, first you need to gather all the data and then start writing the file, but in Denodo you fetch the data and write the data simultaneously. So, for example, if you have 1 million or 2 million records, you don't have to wait to fetch all of the 2 million; you can keep on fetching and writing in the file simultaneously."
"It is easy to virtualize data using the solution."
"It is a highly robust software solution."
"The git configuration really should be improved."
"Denodo has some difficulty supporting large numbers of records."
"It would be good if the solution provided a much-needed cellular platform."
"Denodo's training documentation could be improved by providing more material. From an administrative standpoint, I've found that only Denodo websites provide the usual tutorials. It may be because it's a bit of a restricted tool, but it results in trouble with learning. Normally, I can find help and solutions from other sources, but I haven't been able to find any for Denodo. Other that, it's fine and it performs well. I only have six months of experience, so I can't accurately suggest improvements."
"Documentation needs to be improved"
"Sometimes, Windows-related functions do not work properly in Denodo. The analytic functions in SQL do not work properly."
"The feature that you have to connect on LDAP needs improvement."
"User-specific security at the column and row levels needs to be improved. Instead of applying security at every individual level, it would be better if it were at the group or tier level. It will save a lot of time."
"The primary challenge with Teradata lies in its cost structure, encompassing subscription fees, software licenses, and hardware expenses."
Denodo is ranked 12th in Data Integration with 29 reviews while Teradata QueryGrid is ranked 31st in Data Integration with 1 review. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Teradata QueryGrid is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata QueryGrid writes "Unified and efficient query processing that seamlessly integrates and analyzes data from heterogeneous sources". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Delphix and SSIS, whereas Teradata QueryGrid is most compared with Teradata Data Mover and IBM InfoSphere DataStage.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.