We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Application Security and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"The fact that the solution does security scanning is valuable."
"The most valuable features are the wide array of languages, multiple languages per project, the breakdown of bugs, and the description of vulnerabilities and code smells (best practices)."
"Integrate it into the developers' workbench so that they can bench check their code against what will be done in the server-based audit version."
"It's enabled us to improve software quality and help us to disseminate best practices."
"The solution offers a very good community edition."
"Provides local scanning for developers."
"It is a very good tool for analysis despite its limitations."
"Code Convention: Using the tool to implement some sort of coding convention is really useful and ensures that the code is consistent no matter how many contributors."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
"The solution could improve the management reports by making them easier to understand for the technical team that needs to review them."
"The reporting can be improved."
"If I configure a project in SonarQube, it generates a token. When we're compiling our code with SonarQube, we have to provide the token for security reasons. If IP-based connectivity is established with the solution, the project should automatically be populated without providing any additional token. It will be easy to provide just the IP address. It currently supports this functionality, but it makes a different branch in the project dashboard. From the configuration and dashboard point of view, it should have some transformations. There can be dashboard integration so that we can configure the dashboard for different purposes."
"During the setup process, we only had one issue related to the number of available files. To perform the analysis, you have quite a lot of available file handles, so we had to increase that limit."
"When we have a thousand products published over it, we expect it to be more efficient in terms of serving requests from the browser."
"The software testing tool capability could improve. It does not always integrate well. You have to use a specific plugin and the plugin does not always go in Apple's applications."
"Currently requires multiple tools, lacking one overall tool."
"It should be user-friendly."
Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 110 reviews. Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and Snyk.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
