We performed a comparison between DX NetOps and SolarWinds NPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"A highly scalable solution."
"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."
"The solution is stable."
"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."
"The AI is the best feature in this solution."
"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."
"Their support team is efficient, and it is easy to set up."
"It did a good job of the collection and then an investigation of the net flow of information for understanding the applications that were being used at certain locations."
"You can monitor performance counters effortlessly."
"We found that it was easy to operate, and it was simple if anyone has entry-level working experience or even if someone is not experienced."
"It's a very good tool and a very stable tool."
"Technical support is very helpful with our upgrades."
"I like that SolarWinds NPM is a strong tool for monitoring network devices, switches, and routers. It's also a user-friendly tool. My team also likes how scalable it is."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."
"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."
"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."
"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."
"The hardware requirements can be improved."
"Consolidation of platforms would provide a smoother experience."
"The solution could be more secure."
"If they did some type of synthetic monitoring, it would have been better."
"It has covered everything, so no improvement is required at their end. The only thing is the price."
"Technical support and releases are not particularly reliable."
"It would be nice if SolarWinds added some technical protocols like Modbus. The market needs a simple solution for monitoring a technical device."
"The scalability can be better."
"The solution's customer service is not very good because the support takes too long."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
DX NetOps is ranked 30th in Network Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in Network Monitoring Software with 147 reviews. DX NetOps is rated 8.6, while SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of DX NetOps writes "Good performance, simple setup, and helpful for root cause analysis". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "High-level, comprehensive, and proactive monitoring in a user-friendly interface". DX NetOps is most compared with DX Spectrum, AppNeta by Broadcom, PRTG Network Monitor and IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM), whereas SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, ManageEngine OpManager, ThousandEyes and Entuity. See our DX NetOps vs. SolarWinds NPM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.